The Most Powerful Man In The
World? The “Black” Pope
Count Hans
Kolvenbach—The Jesuit’s General 4/15/00 RICK MARTIN
So, you
thought you were pretty well informed by now about all of the main players on
the “conspiracy” playing field? You’ve
maybe been hearing for years about (or bumped into on your own) the various
elements of society who control our world from behind the scenes.
You’ve
gotten familiar with the role played by, for instance, the Khazarian Zionists
(who invented the word “Jew” to disguise their adopted heritage, as distinguised
from the biblical Judeans), or the role played by the Banksters (banking
gangsters) controlling the economies of the world, by the CFR (Council on
Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Committee
of 300 (the 17 wealthiest so-called “elite” families)—the Rothschilds in England
and Rockefellers in America and Bronfmans in Canada, and on and on, comprising
the physical power structure of the New World Order puppets under the direction
of darkly motivated, other-dimensional “master deceivers” commonly known as
Lucifer or Satan and their “fallen angel” cohorts.
While all of
those details contribute to understanding the Larger Picture, what you are about
to read fills in a most important Missing Link in this entire structure. And I don’t mean a little side issue; I mean
a link so central—yet so well hidden from general public view, and for so
long—that even the most studied of “conspiracy theory” scholars probably have
not put together much of the information that is going to be presented here.
To call the
following outlay “controversial” and “sensitive” is about as mild an
understatement of the truth of the matter as can be made! This missing link changes the entire slant of
the entire playing field!
After months
of anticipation and weeks of preparation, I was finally able to speak with Vatican Assassins author Eric Jon Phelps
on Tuesday, March 14. There was simply
no other way to cover Eric’s historic masterpiece spanning, literally, five
centuries, than to just ask questions covering huge spans of time and major
historical events. It took us almost
four hours to accomplish the task, yet we could easily have gone on for another
forty.
We here at
The SPECTRUM are simply unwilling to
reduce the importance of this work by presenting it in a too distilled
fashion. In fact, in order to share this
material with at least some of the pertinent backup, Eric has granted us
permission to print (directly after the interview) several excerpts from his
soon-to-be-published book which will help you in understanding certain aspects
of this magnificently important and broad-sweeping story. The missing link is surely a central
link.
Let’s call
this story the “Jesuit-Vatican connection” to the unfolding New World Order
agenda. You make up your own mind just
how absolutely central, yet well hidden, has been this link! There’s a good reason the secret Vatican
library is so extensive and yet remains so intact from outside intrusion,
despite the many others who would like to possess such a collection of
information detailing much “censored” data about our true, otherworldy cultural
heritage.
When one
reads a work like Vatican Assassins,
one can’t help but reflect back on the purposely “adjusted” and watered down and
boring moments in high school history class.
Meanwhile, the true history of what has gone on is
dynamic and full of calculated intrigue.
In this
business, I’ve heard and read a lot of things.
But when I had to pick my jaw up off the floor during the reading of
certain historical portions in Eric’s book—well, let me just say that Truth
certainly is stranger, and far more interesting, than the many fictions we’ve
been led to believe are historical fact.
And yet The Truth does fit together like the pieces of a jigsaw
puzzle.
This book
SHOULD be a best-seller, but it is hardly likely to achieve such general
attention—considering how well controlled and censored is the publishing
business. Thus is the reason for our
lengthy presentation of this most astonishing and critically important material
here in The SPECTRUM.
We are in a
time of Truth being revealed from all directions. And there is probably no more fundamental,
mind-rattling, and previous notions-shattering example of that than what is
being presented here. The interview is
directly followed by a number of pertinent excerpts from Eric’s eye-opening book—which will be
available July 1.
[Editor’s note: It should be noted up-front that the
information presented below is the studied opinion of Eric Jon Phelps. We here at The SPECTRUM find much about his presentation of his
historical research which meshes with and expands upon Truth which has been
presented by many other authors in these pages and elsewhere. And that is good; Truth is Truth is Truth, and should all
mesh.
However, for the peace of mind of our unique
readership—which typically has cultivated a more aware spiritual perspective
than the general public—we do
not want to give the impression
that we agree with (or wish to promote) some collateral aspects of Eric’s
presentation having to do with his personal “religious” convictions. The focus of those convictions follows a much
more biblically conventional (literal) path—in stark contrast to the
unconventional, questioning, wide-angle vision of his historical material.
Generally such opinions are simply allowed
to stand on their own—for you to sort and interpret as you see fit—rather than
being singled-out to be addressed editorially.
However, in this case, the practical side of Eric’s stated religious
convictions include the condoning of some degree of violence (or violent
protest) and use of armaments. And such
convictions are very much the
opposite of our philosophical position—for many reasons, not the least of
which is the obvious Adversarial bait-and-entrapment which would result from
choosing what we would consider to be low-frequency responses to schoolroom
Earth’s current challenges.
Yet, if the perceptive reader penetrates
“between the lines” thoughtfully, there is glimpsed a recurring commendable
spiritual message in Eric’s commentary—of “Have the courage to speak The Truth”
and “God helps those who help themselves”—which we certainly DO agree with
wholeheartedly and have long supported enthusiastically.
We are in the time of the Great Awakening on
this planet. The Light of Truth,
intensifying with each passing moment, is nudging many to step forward and share
what they know. Will such ones follow
that nudge or continue to hide in fear?
The answer to that question is perhaps the most important aspect of
schoolroom Earth’s relentless testing at this critical time.
One last-minute footnote before beginning
this interview: The Arts &
Entertainment (A&E) cable television channel just started to air—on Easter
Sunday evening!—a new two-hour documentary called: The Vatican Revealed.
Tape it so you can study it carefully; within the lines of dialog and
some of those people chosen for commentaries are many, many clues to the true
power of the Vatican over world affairs.
It would, of course, be much more revealing to watch the A&E program
AFTER having read and digested the following.]
Martin: Before we begin, let me say a few words. The topic of your book is so comprehensive
and covers, literally, all aspects of global control by the Jesuits, dating back
to 1540. I would like to begin our
conversation with a very important point of clarification so that our readers
have something to hold onto while reading the historical narrative we are about
to present. Let me also add that your
book is one of the most compelling, dynamic, genuinely educational historical
documents I have ever read. I want to
tell you, I am impressed!
You,
literally, link every major global conflict and political assassination to the
hands of the Jesuit Order. The Jews, as
with many other groups you mention, have been the unwitting pawns in this Jesuit
Agenda.
Today, the
present. I’m going to start here, and
then we’re going to go way back in time and work our way up. But, I want to start HERE because it will
give a foundation for going back in time.
Peter
Hans Kolvenbach (front, center): twenty-ninth Superior General, with his
cosmopolitan general staff. From the
book
Jesuits: A Multibiographyby Jean
Lacouture; (French © 1991, English © 1995) Counterpoint Books, P.O. Box 65793,
Washington DC 20035; ISBN 1-887178-05-8.
Today, who
is the Superior General of the Jesuits, the so-called “Black Pope” [black here refers to hidden, evil
activities, not to race or color] who gives the orders to the actual
Pope. Is it still Jean-Baptist
Janssens?
Phelps: Janssens, Frenchman. No, he passed away in 1964. Then Pedro Arrupe came to power. Then, after Arrupe died, in 1988, I believe,
the present Jesuit General is Count Hans Kolvenbach. [See
photo nearby.] I call him Count Hans
Kolvenhoof.
Martin: Let’s discuss this position of “General” and,
in addition, who is this person, Count Hans Kolvenbach? Who does he serve? What are his origins? Where does he hail from?
Phelps: The present General is a Dutchman, his
nationality is Dutch.
Martin: Where is he?
Physically, where is he?
Phelps: He resides in Rome, at the headquarters of
the Jesuits, called the Church of Jesu.
So, the Jesuit General resides in Rome at, what I just called, the Jesuit
headquarters.
Martin: The Church of Jesu, is that near the
Vatican?
Phelps: It’s not far from the Vatican, right. It’s in the same general area. It’s headquarters of the Knights of
Malta.
Martin: Is it part of Vatican City, proper?
Phelps:
Right, I believe, yes it is.
Martin: Where does Satan fit into this picture, and
what is the ultimate goal of the Jesuits, the so-called Society of Jesus?
Phelps:
The Jesuit General, and the other high Jesuit Generals, they are
sorcerers. They are Luciferians, and
they worship what they would call Lucifer.
They do not believe in Satan.
They believe in Lucifer.
Now,
according to Alberto Rivera, he was invited—because he was a top Jesuit at the
time in the late ’60s—he was invited to a “Black Mass” in Spain where there were
quite a few top Jesuit Generals present.
And he called it a “Black Mass”.
Well, when you’re involved in a “Black Mass”, you’re involved in the
worship of Lucifer, all dressed in their black capes and so on.
Martin: I’m fascinated by Count Hans Kolvenbach
because nobody in the world knows who this person is. I’ve never heard the name.
Phelps: Let me just tell you that you can see his
picture and his top Jesuits—just a second and I’ll get the book. The name of the book is called Jesuits: A Multi-Biography, by Jean
Lacoutre, and that is available, usually, in the bookstores. It was published in 1995.
Jean
Lacoutre is a Frenchman. He was a
communist, is a communist. On the last
page of the pictures in it, that is right adjacent to page 343, you see Peter
Hans Kolvenbach. He’s the Jesuit
General, and he looks like just a very evil individual. There’s a Black man, who’s a high Jesuit,
he’s a 29 Superior Jesuit with his cosmopolitan General staff. One of the General staff looks like Ben
Kingsley of Shindler’s List. There are six White men, and one Black
man. And that’s his General staff.
Martin: What is the process of choosing a successor
General?
Phelps: The High Jesuits elect him, and he’s elected
for life—unless he becomes a “heretic”.
Martin: And the so-called “High Jesuits” represent
what group?
Phelps: I would say that they’re the “professed”, the
high 4th Degree. When a Jesuit is
professed, he is under the Jesuit
Oath; he is under the “Bloody Oath” that I have in my book.
Martin: Do we have permission to reprint that Oath in our paper?
Phelps: Of course, absolutely.
Martin: One of my questions has to do with the Oath and it’s similarity to the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion,
and I wrote that question before I got back to the Protocols portion of your book.
Phelps: The Jesuits obviously wrote the Protocols because they have carried out
every protocol in that little handbook.
They have carried everything out.
And, Alberto Rivera says—and he was a Jesuit—he was greatly maligned, not
helped at all by the Apostate, Protestants, and Baptists in this country; he was
helped, somewhat, by Jack Chick. Jack
Chick published his story in six volumes, titled Alberto I, II, III, IV, V, & VI.
Alberto
Rivera says that it was Jews aligned with the Pope who published the Protocols. Well, I tend to feel that it was just the
Jesuits themselves because they, and they alone, were the ones who were able to
bring this to pass.
They’re the
ones in the government. They’re the ones
behind professional sports. The owner of
the Pittsburgh Steelers is a Knight of Malta.
The owner of the Detroit Lions is a Knight of Malta. All your top owners of these ball clubs, for
the most part, are Knights of Malta, getting the people whooped up in this
hoopla over games and sports, while they’re busy creating a tyranny. So, that was one of the things in the Protocols—that they would create
“amusements”.
Another one
they used was Walt Disney, 33rd-degree Freemason—Disneyworld, Disneyland. Another one was Milton Hersey, with Hersey
Park. They create all of these
amusements and games and pastimes to get the people drunk with pleasure, while
they’re busy overthrowing the Protestant form of government.
Martin: Where does Las Vegas factor into all of
this?
Phelps: Las Vegas, well, for the most part, is
controlled by the Mafia. But all the
high Mafia families are Roman Catholic, and they are ALL subordinate to the Pope
or to the Cardinal of New York, which is Cardinal O’Connor—because the
Commission, the Mafia Commission resides in New York.
Frank
Costello was a member of the Mob Commission, and he was intimate, personal
friends with Knight of Malta, Hollywood mogul, Joe Kennedy. And that has not changed.
So, the High
Knights are good, dear brothers with the High Mafia Dons—the Gambinos, the
Lucchese, the Columbos, all of them. And
they control Hollywood, not the
Jews. It’s only Jews who are front-men
who are involved in Hollywood and working for the Mafia and for the Cardinal,
just like in politics it would be Arlen Spector. Arlen Spector was Spelly’s [Cardinal Spellman’s] Jew in the
assassination [of President Kennedy],
and he would never say a word about it.
Martin: Now, as we go through here, if there’s
anything that you don’t want me to print, please let me know because, literally,
I’m going to print everything we say in this conversation.
Phelps: That’s fine, that’s fine with me because it
needs to be said.
Martin: Let’s get back to Count Hans Kolvenbach. I want to shine the spotlight on this guy for
just a little bit here. Let’s talk about
him. What does he do? Who is he?
Let’s talk about his position as “General”. How do they exercise this control over the
Pope? Does the Pope know he’s a
pawn?
Phelps: Ok, one question at a time. So, which question do you want me to deal
with?
Martin:
Let’s just shine the light
right on the Count.
Phelps:
The Jesuit General, ok.
Martin: Let’s start there, and you tell me everything
you want to tell me about that position.
Phelps: The Jesuit General is the absolute, complete,
and total dictator and autocrat of the Order.
When he speaks, his provincials move.
The provincials are his major subordinates. There are around 83 provincials right
now.
As I
understand it, the Jesuit Order has divided the world into 83 regions. Ok?
For each region, there is a Jesuit provincial. There are 10 provincials in the United
States. There is one for Central
America. There is one for Ireland. They’ve divided up the world into these
provinces.
So it’s old
Babylonian provincial government, centered in Nebuchadnezzar or the Jesuit
General himself; so it’s strictly a Roman form of government where all the
states or provinces are subordinate to this worldwide sovereign.
The Jesuit
General exercises full and complete power over the Order. He meets with his provincials. When they decide to start a war or an
agitation, he gets the information from the provincial of that country, how best
to go about this, the demeanor of the people, and then he uses legitimate
grievances to foam an agitation—like the 1964 Civil Rights Movement. That was ALL a Jesuit agitation, completely,
because the end result was more consolidation of power in Washington with the
1964 Civil Rights Act that was written by [the longtime President of the University of
Notre Dame, the Reverend] Theodore Hesburgh.
The Jesuit
General rules the world through his provincials. And the provincials then, of course, rule the
lower Jesuits, and there are many Jesuits who are not “professed”, so many of
the lower Jesuits have no idea what’s going on at the top. They have no concept of the power of their
Order.
It’s just
like Freemasonry. The lower Freemasons
have no idea that the High Shriner Freemasons are working for the Jesuit
General. They think that they’re just
doing works and being good people. But
the bottom line is that the high-level Freemasons are subject, also, to the
Jesuit General because the Jesuit General, with Fredrick the Great, wrote the
High Degrees, the last 8 Degrees, of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry when Fredrick
protected them when they were suppressed by the Pope in 1773.
So, you have
the alignment with the Jesuit Order and the most powerful Freemason they had in
the craft, Fredrick the Great, during their suppression. That is an irrefutable conclusion. And then, when you see the Napoleonic Wars,
the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars carried out by Freemasonry,
everything Napoleon did, and the Jacobins, whatever they did, completely
benefited the Jesuit Order.
It’s to this
end that Alexander Dumas wrote his The
Count Of Monte Cristo. The Count is
the Jesuit General. Monte=Mount,
Cristo=Christ. The Count of the Mount of
Christ. Alexander Dumas was talking
about the Jesuit General getting vengeance when the Jesuits were suppressed, and
many of them were consigned to an island, three hours sailing, West, off the
coast of Portugal. And so, when the
Jesuits finally regained their power, they punished all of the monarchs of
Europe who had suppressed them, drove them from their thrones, including the
Knights of Malta from Malta, using Napoleon.
And
Alexander Dumas, who fought for the Italian patriots
in 1848, to free Rome from the temporal power of the Pope, wrote many books and
one of the books was to expose this, and that was The Count Of Monte Cristo.
So, when you
read that book, bear in mind that it’s really a satire on the Jesuit Order
regaining their power in France. The
Count of Monte Cristo has an intelligence apparatus that can’t be beat. Well, that’s the Jesuit Order.
But the
Count doesn’t get what he really ought to have, or his last wish, and that’s the
love of woman. He gains back all of his
political power; he gains back everything he lost; but he doesn’t have the love
of a woman. And THAT is the Jesuit
Order. They have no women. They have no love of a woman. Because to have a wife, to have a woman,
means you have an allegiance to your wife and family, and you cannot obey the
General. That’s why they will NEVER be
married, and that’s one of the great KEYS to their success.
They can
betray a nation and walk away. They can
betray all the Irish Catholics getting on the Titanic, and walk away. They can betray us in Vietnam and walk
away. They can betray us every time we
go to the hospital and get radiated and cut and drugged, and walk away, because
it’s “for the greater glory of God”—Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: the greater glory of
the god who sits in Rome.
Martin: What is the ULTIMATE goal of the Jesuits?
Phelps:
Their ultimate goal is the rule of the world, with the Pope of their
making, from Solomon’s rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem. That’s their ultimate goal.
Martin: And why is Solomon’s Temple rebuilt so
important?
Phelps: Because the Jesuits have always wanted
that. When Ignatius Loyola first started
the Order, one of the first things he did was, he wanted to go to Jerusalem and
set up the Jesuit headquarters there.
So, he went there, he tried to do it and failed, came back, went to
school, started his Latin studies, etc.
Maybe it might be a good idea to just review a little bit about Ignatius
Loyola.
Martin:
Yes.
Phelps: Ok, Ignatius Loyola was a Spanish soldier,
and he was wounded at a battle between the French and the Spanish, and his leg
was shattered. Well, the French General,
because Loyola was very brave in conflict, ordered his own doctors to attend
Loyola. So they set the leg and sent him
back to his home—which, of course, he was royalty to the Counsel of Loyola in
Spain, in the area of the Basques.
Loyola,
through his series of desiring to regain his leg—it had healed improperly, so he
made a rack where he would stretch the leg, with severe, horrible, awful
pain—and trying to stretch this leg to get it back to normal shape, he endured
awful, terrible pain. He had it
rebroken, again, a couple of times and it still did not heal properly, so he had
a perpetual limp. He could no longer be
the courtier among women, and as a result, he went into this depression, and he
then had this vision of the saints, etc., etc., and he wrote his spiritual
exercises.
I will stop
at the spiritual exercises, just for a minute, but I’ll take up from there. Loyola then wanted to form an army, but when
this happened with his spiritual exercises, those spiritual exercises would be
basic training for all of his Jesuits.
That’s what they will ALL go through.
That’s what every Jesuit goes through today.
One of the
maxims of the spiritual exercises is that if my superior says “black is white
and white is black”, then that’s the way it is.
That is in his spiritual exercises.
That is what is quoted in JFK,
when Kevin Costner is telling his people: “Hey, people, we’ve got to start
thinking like the CIA. Black is white
and white is black.” That was a Jesuit
giveaway that the Jesuits produced that movie, because they’re quoting Ignatius
Loyola in that movie from his spiritual exercises.
So, Loyola
had an indomitable will. He had a will
of steel, and he set his mind to regain back what the Papacy had lost to the
Reformation. And so, he went to the
Pope, and the Pope in 1540 then created the Jesuit Order. But this man is a soldier, he’s a lawyer, and
he put together a legion of soldiers and warriors to get back what Rome had
lost, as well as institute a World Government for the Pope, from Jerusalem. This was in 1540.
He started
the Order in 1536. He was arrested by
the Inquisition, and he was released, and he went to the Pope; he threw himself
at the feet of the Pope. He would be
completely at his service. The Pope
chartered him, and that Pope was Pius III.
The Pope chartered them, created the Jesuit Order; now he has Papal
protection, and they began their awful history of deeds of blood. And war after war after war after war,
they’re all attributed to the Jesuit Order in some way. Catholic nobles, with lots of money, donated
castles and schools and money to the Jesuit Order.
Virtually
everything they own has been given to them or stolen by them. Of course, they stole all of the fortunes of
the Jews in World War II. They stole all
their gold, all their assets and everything, whenever they went into a
country. What’s just been released is
NOTHING compared to what they’ve taken.
In Edmond
Paris’s book, printed by Ozark Publications, called The Vatican Against Europe, it gets into
great detail of what they did. It calls
it—the last 30 years of war is all attributable to the Jesuits, their massacres
of the Serbs and Jews, etc. But Edmond
Paris did not understand that the Jesuit General—and this is one of the most
important points I want to make about Von Kolvenbach—the Jesuit General is in
complete control of the international intelligence community: that’s the CIA, the FBI, the KGB, the Israeli
Mossad, the German BND, the British SIS.
The Jesuit General is in COMPLETE CONTROL of the entire intelligence
apparatus—FBI, every bureaucratic agency in this country, all of it; he is in
complete control of it.
So, whenever
he wants to find something out about an individual, they put in the Social
Security number, and everything from all of the intelligence apparatus kicks-in
and he and his provincials can review everything about that man. Credit cards, you name it, everything that’s
attached to Rome’s social security number, which FDR put upon us in 1933 with
the help of Spellman; at the time, I believe he was Archbishop, or maybe it was
Cardinal Hayes—but Rome was behind FDR in putting him in office.
The couple
of things that he did was implement social insecurity, the income tax, and
recognizing Joseph Stalin’s bloody Jesuit USSR government. So, with the giving of us the Social Security
number, that is Rome’s number—that’s why I refuse to use it—and that’s why they
want everybody using it for everything: driver’s license, tax return, credit
card, everything you do, that number is you and that number is Rome’s
number.
Martin: Let me just back-up here for a minute. What comes to mind is Louis Freeh, head of
the FBI.
Phelps: Roman Catholic, good altar boy. Probably a Knight of Columbus; I can’t prove
it. But anybody with that kind of power
has got to be a Knight of Columbus.
And the
Knights of Columbus implement Jesuit politics.
And Louis Freeh was the one behind the Waco atrocity and the Oklahoma
City bombing atrocity. And his top
sniper was a Japanese Roman Catholic named Lon Horiuchi.
So, it’s
Roman Catholics in control, Knights in control of the FBI, who carried out all
of this killing. And those two men,
Louis Freeh and Lon Horiuchi are personally accountable to Cardinal O’Connor
of New York. And Cardinal
O’Connor of New York is the most powerful Cardinal in the country. He is the military vicar. And that’s why Bush kissed his fanny for
going to Bob Jones, because Cardinal O’Connor
is the King of the American Empire.
And he rules his Empire from that Palace, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, “the
little Vatican”.
Martin: And is he in contact, do you think, with
Kolvenbach?
Phelps: Of course.
O’Connor himself is not a Jesuit, but the Jesuits are like the SS of the
Catholic Church. They maintain
order.
And the ones
closest to him who maintain order are the Jesuits of Fordham University. Now, one of them—the head of Fordham
University, I believe he is an Irishman, is also a member of the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations]. And I have that right here in the Annual
Report of the CFR of 1993. Those Jesuits
at Fordham maintain semblance and rule over the Cardinal in New York. And, of course, the powerful Jesuits of
Fordham include Avery Dulles and John Foster Dulles, one of the writers of the
book on the Second Vatican Council.
Martin: Let’s back-up now, let’s go back. What’s the Council of Trent?
Phelps:
The Council of Trent was the response of Rome to the Protestant
Reformation. Remember—the Protestant
Reformation brought us all of the political liberty that we know of today. There’s no such thing as national sovereignty
without the Reformation. There’s no such
thing as private rights without the Reformation. There’s no such thing as the Law of Nations,
as we know of it today, of Montesquieu and the others, without the
Reformation.
So, when the
Reformation came with their doctrines of salvation by grace through faith alone,
and that there was no need for the priesthood to go to Heaven—that all we need
is salvation in Christ, and Romans
1:17: the righteous shall live by
faith. When the Reformation came, it
completely stripped Rome of its spiritual power. The priests were no longer wanted because the
people were getting the word of God in a Bible, specifically in Holland, England,
and Germany. And so, with these great
revivals breaking forth and the Reformation happening, nations were breaking
away from the power of the Pope. The
Holy Roman Empire was breaking up.
Charles V, the Emperor, resigned and became a monk and a gardener. So, the Lord was moving mightily in breaking
the power of the Holy Roman Empire, started by Charlemagne and the Pope.
Well, this
was not good for Rome because they were losing lots of money. The nations were not paying “Peter’s pence”
anymore, which today we call “foreign aid” in this country. And so the Pope was very upset about his.
What’s he
going to do? These nations are breaking
away from us; they’re not under our temporal or spiritual power; and it’s very
important to remember that the Pope claims two powers—spiritual and temporal—and
with the breaking of his spiritual power, he then lost his temporal power. In other words, he no longer had the ability
to rule the people through the king of the country, because the king was
breaking away, like Henry VIII.
So, Henry
VIII broke away from the Roman Church and formed the Church of England; he no
longer was subject to the Pope. This was
happening in England, in Germany, in Holland, and other places.
As a result
of this, the Devil raised up Ignatius Loyola with his demonisms, his “spiritual
exercises” and—because Loyola had been a member of the Spanish Alumbrados,
which is what we call the Illuminati today, and he used the Jesuit Order
to attempt to regain back what had been taken by the Reformation—what the Lord
had done through Luther, Calvin, and Knox.
And, by the way, Luther, Calvin, and Knox—none of those men died violent
deaths. They all lived to older age and
died peacefully, amidst the power of the Jesuit machinations.
The Council
of Trent consists of 25 Sessions. Those
25 Sessions accurse and condemn all the doctrines of the Reformation. It condemns anybody who does not believe that
the literal Jesus Christ is in the host [holy communion bread], and that his
literal blood is in the wine. That’s
called transubstantiation. Anybody who
does not believe that is an accursed anathema.
Anybody who believes that their salvation is outside the Catholic Church
is accursed anathema. Anybody who
believes in justification by grace through faith—anathema, accursed. Anybody who believes that the Pope is not the
vicar of Christ—accursed, anathema. You
see, all of these doctrines were being put forth as a result of reading the Bible, which produced the Reformation,
and so the Jesuits accursed everything that the Reformers were preaching. This is all in Law called the Council of
Trent.
In the 4th
Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn
freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience. So, no man has the right to choose his own
religion; no man has the right to publish what he feels is the truth; and no man
has the right to freedom of conscience.
Those rights
were secured by our Baptist/Calvinist forefathers in the First Amendment. The man who wrote the First Amendment was James Madison, who
was a Baptist/Calvinist, and he was told by that Baptist/Calvinist in Virginia,
Doc. John Leland: “If you don’t secure all those rights, Virginia will not
ratify the Constitution.” Virginia was a Baptist/Calvinist state.
So, we have
a warfare between the Council of Trent and the doctrines of the Reformation,
particularly as outlined by John Calvin in his Institutes Of The Christian
Religion. Calvin [1536] wrote the Institutes Of The Christian Religion, he
finished it when he was 27, and he dedicated it to the King of France. And because the Jesuits so hated him, he was
driven from France and he resided in Geneva to the day of his death, when he
became Governor of Geneva. It’s Calvin
and his Institutes Of The Christian
Religion vs. Loyola and his Council of Trent, if you want it sewed-up in two
major documents.
Martin: Council of Trent was what year?
Phelps: From 1545-1563, eighteen years. And Trent is a little town in Italy. So, it was a Council that took place in the
town of Trent, Italy.
The Presbyterian Westminster Confession And
Faith that was finished in 1648, after the 30 Years War, is another
extension of Calvin’s Institutes, and
is what the Church of Scotland and the Covenanters
went by when they resisted the powers of Rome and England. That document is a major document, and it’s
not the new Westminster Confession,
it’s the old one of 1648, where they called the Pope the man of sin, that Roman
Anti-Christ, and they also denounced anti-Christian tyranny.
And that it
is their duty, to use what they call “the sword of the spirit”, which is the
Word of God, which we read in Ephesians,
Chapter 6, and “the sword of just defense”—the gun, the sword.
So, us
Calvinists believe that there is a time for peace and a time for war, and we do
not refuse to go to the battlefield when it’s necessary. It was the Calvinists who gave us our
political liberty in England with Cromwell.
He was a Calvinist and an independent Baptist. It was Calvinists in Holland who gave the
Dutch their political liberty, with William of Orange, and later his son, Prince
Maurice, and then later, in our great country, when it was Washington, the
Freemason who did not go into that Masonic Lodge that last 30 years of his
life—in his own words—who was a Baptist and a Calvinist. He was baptized in the First Baptist Church
of New York by one of his captains, Pastor Gano, all surrounded by
Calvinists.
That’s why
they didn’t surrender at Valley Forge; that’s why, when they were naked, when
they went through the snow, barefoot, they endured that because they were Bible-believing Calvinists and they
refused to submit to the tyranny of King George, who was controlled by the
Jesuits.
And that is
the soul of our country. If we lose that
soul, we’ve lost everything. And those
very same Baptists, in the Second
Amendment, secured their right to bear arms, because they secured the right,
the “sword of just defense”. And the
“sword of the spirit” is contained in the First Amendment, the right to have the
Bible never taken from them. The two swords of Calvinism are secured in
the First and Second Amendments. Without those first two Amendments, all the others are
nothing.
Martin: Well, I got to my question #2. So, let’s go to #3 of the seventy. (laughter)
How does
Shriner Freemason President Harry Truman’s signing into law of the Emergency War
Powers Act of 1950 factor into the Jesuit Agenda?
Phelps: First of all, Harry Truman, who the Japanese
called “Dirty Harry”—when they heard the movie Dirty Harry came out, they thought it
was a movie about Harry Truman, according to my Japanese pastor friend, Daniel
Fuji, who has passed away.
Harry Truman
was put in office by the Jesuits, the Pensergast Democratic machine in
Missouri.
Harry Truman takes over after FDR’s murder, because he was
murdered in the home of Bernard Baruch.
When he did that, he then finished up the war with the hoax called the
dropping of the nuclear bombs, to purposely create this greater hoax called the
Cold War, that would enable the Vatican to knock over country after country
after country, and replace the leaders with dictators, subordinate to the
Pope. That was the purpose of the Cold
War.
And so, when
Harry Truman in 1950 signed into law the Emergency War Powers Act, the Cold War
was in full force. They were building
bomb shelters, etc. So the nation was in
kind of a frenzy.
When he
signed this into law, it put the whole country under military or martial law,
and that’s when the flags in every courtroom, state and federal, began to be
changed. And every state flag and every
U.S. flag is now trimmed in gold fringe.
And whenever you see a flag trimmed in gold fringe, that means that it is
the flag of the Commander-in-Chief. Now,
if it’s the state flag, it means that’s the flag of the governor, as
Commander-in-Chief. And if it’s the
federal flag, or the national flag, more correctly, it’s the flag of the
Commander-in-Chief in Washington.
So, all your
courts are nothing more than courts of military rule. They all proceed with summary
procedures. The jury has no power of
jury nullification. And they are simply
enforcing the laws of the Empire, which I call 14th Amendment America, which is a
military-style, King of England-style country.
The courts are nothing more than courts of the king’s bench, as you can
see in Blackstone’s Commentaries.
And the
banks, as you walk into every bank, they all have a flag trimmed in gold
fringe. The bank is what England would
call, in Blackstone’s day, the king’s bank.
So, we have the king’s bank, and we have the king’s bench. And it’s run according to military rule,
according to Berkheimer’s great work
Military Rule And Martial Law, published in 1914.
When Harry
Truman did this, there was a consummation of a great plan to put us under the
Emergency War Powers Act and, actually, a war rule. “Daylight savings time” is what was called
“war time”. This country only went to
daylight savings time during World War II, and they called it, at that time, war
time. So, nothing’s changed. We’ve never gone back to not turning back our
clocks. We’re still on war time. The income tax is a war tax. It was called a victory tax in 1942.
So, people
are paying a war tax, they’re under war time, they’re under an emergency war
powers act, and the courts are war courts.
Martin:
Regarding the assassination of President John Kennedy, which
could take this entire interview, you say that the assassination was
ordered by the Jesuit General, executed by Pope Paul VI, and carried out by the
“American Pope”, Francis Cardinal Spellman—who, in turn, used the Knights of
Malta, Shriner Freemasons, Knights of Columbus, and Mafia Dons, including the
FBI and CIA, to carry out the order from Rome.
Would you explain why you believe your particular theory on the
assassination to be an accurate representation of the facts?
Phelps: Sure.
Alright, number one: The powers that be are properly outlined [in his book], and proven through two
centuries of showing how it’s all been put together. Now, as to why, I will be conservative and
stick with Fletcher Prouty’s reasons, that he outlined in his JFK and also his other book called The Secret Team.
The reason
why Kennedy was assassinated was he wanted to end the Vietnam War, and he wanted
to end the rule of the CIA. That begets
two questions: Did Rome want the Vietnam
War? And, did Rome control the CIA? The answer is yes on both counts.
We know, on
its face, that the Vietnam War was called “Spelly’s War”—Cardinal Spellman’s
war. He went over to the warfront many
times and he called the American soldiers the “soldiers of Christ”. The man who was the Commander of the American
forces was a Roman Catholic, CFR member, possibly a Knight of Columbus, I don’t
know, but he was General William Westmoreland.
So,
Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s agent to make sure that war was prosecuted
properly. And another overseer of
Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman’s boy, Lyndon Baines Johnson. Lyndon Baines Johnson was a 33rd-degree
Freemason. He was also part of the
assassination, with J. Edgar Hoover, another 33rd-degree Freemason.
And Johnson
went to Cardinal Spellman’s death at St. Patrick’s Cathedral, and the picture
can be seen in Cooney’s work The American
Pope. So, Johnson was completely at the beck and
call of Cardinal Spellman through Cartha DeLoach, the 3rd-in-control of the
FBI. According to Curt Gentry, in his Hoover: The Man And The Secrets,
DeLoach had a phone at his bedside direct
to Johnson, and Johnson could call him anytime.
DeLoach was a Knight of Malta, subject to Spellman.
Spellman
wanted the Vietnam War, why? Spellman
was controlled by the Jesuits of Fordham.
Why did the Jesuit General want the Vietnam War? The people of Vietnam, the Buddhists, were
unconvertible. They would not convert to
Catholicism. They didn’t need Rome.
There had
been a Jesuit presence in Vietnam for centuries, so it had been decided that
about a million or so Buddhists would have to be “purged”. They would later continue this purge of
Cambodia, with Pol Pot, and the purge is yet for Thailand. It was a purging of Laos, Cambodia, and
Vietnam of all these Buddhists, just like they purged the Buddhists of China
with Mao Zedong, because Mao Zedong was completely controlled by the
Jesuits. So, they wanted the Vietnam
War.
The other
thing is that Rome is in control of the drug trade. The Vatican controls all of the drug
trade—all of the heroin, all of the opium, all of the cocaine, everything going
around in Columbia.
Columbia has
a concordat with the Pope. A concordat
is a treaty with the Pope. Hitler had a
concordat.
Mussolini had a concordat.
Franco had a
concordat. They want to set up a
concordat here, which was the reason for Reagan formally recognizing the
sovereign state of Vatican City in 1984.
The greatest traitor we ever had was Ronald Reagan.
So, they had
a concordat. Columbia has a
concordat. Do you think that drugs
running out of Columbia, with a country that has a concordat with Rome, is not
controlled by Rome? If Rome didn’t want
the drug trade out of Columbia, they’d end the concordat. The whole drug trade is run by high Mafia
families out of the country of Columbia, subject to the Jesuit General.
And the
Jesuit General ran the Opium trade, a couple of centuries ago, out of
China. They ran the silk trade, the
pearl trade. The movie Shogun is but a slight scratching of the
surface of the Jesuit “black ships” that trafficked in all of this silk and
pearls and gold and opals and everything they could pull out of the East,
including opium.
The Vietnam
War was to consolidate and control this huge massive drug-trade that would
inundate every American city with drugs, being brought in by the CIA with their
Air America, and then distributed by the Trafficante
family throughout the United States—Santos Trafficante out of Miami.
So we have
the Mafia and the CIA working together in the drug trade. We have the Mafia and the CIA working
together in the assassination of Kennedy.
The first
reason why the Jesuit General [at that
time, Jean-Baptist Janssens]
wanted Kennedy out of the way was because he was going to end the Vietnam
War.
The second
reason is, he wanted to end the reign of the CIA, because the CIA had betrayed
him in the person of McGeorge Bundy, by not giving the cover to the Cuban
patriots to retake Cuba from that Roman Catholic, Jesuit-trained, grease-ball
bastard—he was a bastard, his father was a Nazi—Fidel Castro.
Kennedy was
betrayed by the CIA at the Bay of Pigs invasion, which sacrificed all the
patriots on the shores of the Bay of Pigs there, so Castro had no real
opposition. This was the same tactic,
used by the CIA and the KGB at the top, working together with Angleton
controlling it, in the Hungarian Revolution, when the CIA fomented that
revolution, and then betrayed all of those patriots into the hands of the Soviet
army and KGB, which infuriated certain top CIA officials.
It’s the
same tactic: you raise up a revolution and you sacrifice the men who truly want
to resist. When that happened, when
McGeorge Bundy stopped the air cover of the Bay of Pigs invasion, that ended
that resistance to Castro and it enthroned him into power. And, of course, it was meant to be by the
Jesuits because they HAD trained him. So
now Kennedy looks bad. He’s got egg all
over his face. What does he want to
do? He signs a Memorandum, according to
Fletcher Prouty, and takes all of the power away from the CIA, and gives it to
the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The CIA was
built by the Knights of Malta. One of
the founders of the CIA was “Wild” Bill Donovan,
an Irish Roman Catholic, who are the most fanatical, and his brother was
a Dominican priest, Vincent. So, the CIA
was founded by this high Roman Catholic, the first head, to solidify the
Catholic or the Vatican control of it.
I’m not
against the Catholic people; I’m against Rome’s hierarchy. The American Catholic people know NOTHING of
what’s going on. And if they did, there
would be a march on St. Patrick’s tomorrow morning. So, as I’m against the hierarchy, I’m showing
that Kennedy was against the Vietnam War, and he was going to do away with the
CIA.
Well, the
Jesuits had brought in all of their top Nazi SS soldiers into the CIA because
the Jesuits were using the SS to kill the Jews in Europe. When the Einsatzgruppen went into Russia, the
Jesuits followed with the SS and purged Western Russia of all its Jews. That’s why Stalin deliberately killed 40,000
of his best officers. That’s why he
kicked out his best generals, purged them, because he wanted to make sure that
the Red Army would lose with the advance of the German army, because following
that would come the SS and purge Russia of the Jews that Stalin so hated. And by the way, justice is often poetic
because Stalin’s daughter married a Jew.
Now, the CIA
was composed of the SS. The CIA now was
an arm—and the intelligence arm—of the Vatican.
The Knights of Malta were throughout.
Casey was a Knight of Malta.
Angleton was a Knight of Malta.
The Knights were through and through.
Angleton manned the “Vatican desk”, and that is a desk within the CIA
that has a direct link to the Vatican.
So, Kennedy
wanted to end this “intelligence community”.
That was the end of him.
Thus for
anyone attempting to end the CIA, and attempting to end the Vietnam War, and
also because he attacked the Jesuits’ Federal Reserve Bank by printing United
States Notes, they got rid of him. They
killed our only Roman Catholic president.
And it’s
another piece of poetic justice that a Roman Catholic—not Protestants, like
Harry Truman, FDR, and others—it’s a Roman Catholic who truly sought to resist
the temporal power of the Pope in this country.
And in many ways, even though Kennedy was, in fact, a socialist and
communist, at least he resisted the temporal power of the Pope. And for that we should be thankful and
remember his name.
But what
have they done to his name? They’ve
slammed it. They drag it into the
dirt. Every time you see it on TV, they
parade before you his womanizing, which I don’t deny, but my goodness, can’t we
give him some credit where credit is due?
That’s why they got rid of John F. Kennedy.
And then, of
course, as soon as he’s assassinated, John McCone, the head of the CIA, the
following day goes to the White House and they reverse Kennedy’s Memorandum of
reversing the Vietnam War and make a full-scale, carte blache war.
The CIA then
is tremendously and heavily funded, because it was a CIA war. And there they tried all of their new
technology, their anti-gravity machines, their men who they’re trying to make
like the “million-dollar man”. They
tried out all their new technology in Vietnam.
It was a great experimental theater, and Kennedy knew this. He knew it, and he knew that the American
people had no idea what was going down, and he still tried to resist it, against
his father’s warnings. Because his
father was the most powerful Knight of Malta in the Empire.
Martin: Any theories on why they took
out junior?
Phelps: Yes.
According to Tom Kuncle, in his publication, John F. Kennedy, Jr. wanted
to find his father’s real killers, and he had the power to publish the
conclusion. So, they took him out right
away. They would not allow that to
happen.
Martin: Why haven’t you been taken out?
Phelps: Because I am immortal—until the Lord is done
with me. I am a Calvinist and a Baptist,
and we believe in the sovereignty of God.
And as long as we are operating in His Will, they cannot touch us,
regardless of their power.
Martin: Which is why we’re having this
conversation.
Phelps: Which is why we’re having the
conversation. Don’t think for one moment
they’re not tapping this phone. They
know this. The issue is here. We’re talking about a providential, sovereign
God who wishes to move, using second causes, men, just as the Devil does.
The Devil
always uses second causes, men. So, it’s
one group of men vs. another group of men, and one path leads to evil, and the
true, almighty God leads to goodness.
The problem
is, with us, there are very few men who want to believe God anymore. Nobody believes He can deliver anymore. It’s just a handful of us who say: “Well,
we’re going to do His Will; we’re going to trust Him in His Power.”
And like the
Hebrews getting ready to be thrown into the fiery furnace of Nebuchadnezzar, our
God is able to deliver us. We’re going
to tell the truth!
Martin: Let’s see here. I can throw away a lot of these
questions. So much of it seems, in a
way, irrelevant to our current times because there’s so much going on now. But, good grief! I was just stunned to read in your book of
all the historical things that have happened as a result of these evil
people. You dedicated the book to four
Roman Catholics who, I’m sure, no one has ever heard of: Charles Chiniquy,
Jeremiah Crowley, Emmett McLaughlin, and Alberto Rivera. Why them?
Phelps:
Because those Roman Catholic men were priests; they left the
priesthood and told the truth about what was really happening. And all four of them, except one, I think
Emmett McLaughlin, paid with their life.
Chiniquy was the great exposer of the Jesuit assassination of President
Lincoln, when he wrote his masterpiece Fifty Years In The Church Of Rome in
1886. He proves that Lincoln was
assassinated by the Jesuits, and that it was covered-up by our government at the
time.
Jeremiah
Crowley: that priest was a great Irishman who came here and, seeing the
corruption of the Archdiocese in Chicago, that it was so corrupt, he left it and
exposed it. And, of course, he later
came to Christ and became a Bible-believer, which they would call a
Protestant. Protestants today don’t
believe the Bible. Protestantism of today is an empty shell,
it’s nothing. But, back then, in 1912,
they believed the Bible.
Crowley,
then, exposed many things, and one of the things he exposed, that helped me with
this, was that he warned that the Jesuits, with their Knights of Columbus—which,
he says, the Knights of Columbus, named after Columbus, who he tells us was a
Spanish Jew and a pirate and a deflowerer of young girls—that Columbus was no
Christian.
He has a
tremendous section in his book on Columbus.
That the purpose of the Knights of Columbus was to fulfill Jesuitical
politics, and part of those politics was to restore the temporal power of the
Pope because, you remember, the Pope had lost that in 1870 and they wanted to
get it back. And they got it back with
Mussolini in 1929.
Well, in the
book that Crowley wrote in 1912, he says that Taft and Teddy Roosevelt were all
cow-towing to the Pope and the Cardinals of New York. And he said they’re going to use our military
to restore the Pope’s temporal power around the world.
And THAT was
absolutely correct. That is American foreign policy. And the Council of Trent is the American
foreign policy of today. That’s what’s
going on in Serbia and Bosnia. It’s the
Council of Trent—the Jesuits using the American Air Force to bomb those orthodox
people to smithereens. But, that was
Crowley’s great contribution.
Next, Emmett
McLaughlin wrote several books. He wrote
The People’s Padre; he wrote Crime And Immorality In The Catholic
Church, showing that Catholic nations are more lawless and more criminal
than Protestant nations, and he proved it with statistics from the jails.
Emmett
McLaughlin also wrote another book called The Assassination Of Abraham Lincoln,
where he, again, shows that Lincoln was assassinated by the Jesuits. So, Emmett McLaughlin came out of the
Catholic Church. To my knowledge, he
never was born again. He never was
saved, but he did tell the truth. He
married a nun, and lived a virtuous and honorable life after he left.
The last one
was, of course, Alberto Rivera, who was greatly hated by the Vatican because he
was a very high Jesuit who came out and, in the late ’60s, about 1969, exposed
the power of Rome in the ecumenical movement, that Rome controlled Kathryn
Kuhlman; that Rome controlled Billy Graham; that Rome controlled, virtually, our
government—Ronald Reagan.
Reagan, when
he took the Oath of Office, faced the obelisk, indicating that this country will
ultimately have a concordat. So, Alberto
Rivera converted to Christ, wonderfully, and he started a ministry called The
Anti-Christ Information Center, out of Los Angeles.
They tried
to kill him five times. A dentist jammed
a needle up between his teeth, trying to give him an infection in the
brain. When he passed out, about a year
or so later, they couldn’t figure it out.
Everybody was praying for him.
And this was discovered when he went to another dentist. He had it removed.
He was
pushed in front of a subway train. They
tried five times to kill the man, and finally he died, I believe, of cancer, in
a hospital, about three years ago. But
these four wonderful, great, Catholic priests did their best to expose the power
of Rome and its attempts to destroy our sovereign, Protestant, Bible-believing nation. And so, to them, I dedicate it.
Martin: What compelled you to write this book? What started it for you?
Phelps: I was always taught to be a
patriot, a patriot first and foremost—America first, and everybody else
second. Later, when I came to know the
Lord, at 17, I realized the Bible
taught the same thing—that the Lord had instituted nations. The Lord never instituted world governments;
that’s always the result of the Devil’s working.
So, being a
patriot and a nationalist—believing in national sovereignty—I was saved at 17,
went into the Air Force, was garrisoned in a nuclear weapons area for three
years in Germany, came back and started to go to Bible college.
When I went
to Bible college, the issue of the King James came up, as far as it being
an archaic version. And that’s what I
used and I had never given it a thought.
Well, some were using NIV, some NASB, and I thought: “Well, maybe it’s
just a modern version of what I have here.”
And I thought: “Well, if they want to use that, that’s fine, but I’ll use
the King James.”
I found that
the underlying Greek text for the King
James, the Textus Receptus, was
the Greek text of the Reformation. It
represents 95% of the existing manuscripts that we have today. The Greek text that underlies all these other
versions—there’s a Westcott and Hort Greek text, which I then discovered was
really a conspiracy to adulterate the Textus Receptus in England, led by
Brooke Foss Westcott and Anthony Hort, who were Maryolitors,
Mary-worshippers.
Later, I
found out that they had invited Cardinal Newman to sit in on the revision
committee. Well, Cardinal Newman was a
traitor to the Anglican Church, with his Track 90, which blew-off the Anglican
Church. He then left England and
he was then a Cardinal by Pius IX.
So, here we
have Cardinal Newman, and E. B. Pusey, had been invited to sit on this revision
committee, the end result being a Greek text that had been produced that was
pro-Jerome’s Latin Vulgate.
Jerome’s Latin Vulgate is the
basis for the Jesuit’s Reheims-Douay
text, that was put out in 1582, that was attempting to rival William Tyndale’s
English text, which later became the King
James Version of 1611.
So now I see
this awful Jesuit hand in my Bible
college, attempting to deprive me of the Word of God, the authorized version of
1611, in it’s present edition of 1769.
Now I thought “Well, here the Jesuits are, what else have they
done?” And the next thing I was led to
was the Lincoln assassination. And I can
remember reading Burke McCarty’s The
Suppressed Truth About The Assassination Of Abraham Lincoln, and weeping in
the back room, when I was in college.
Martin:
For me, one of the most compelling portions of your book was the
series of revelations about Lincoln. I
was stunned by that.
Phelps: That’s what they did. Remember, Lincoln was not going to go along
with the 14th Amendment. He wanted those Southern states to re-enter
the Union on the same footing that they had left, which would have left us with
a federal Republic as Washington had established it. This the Jesuits would not allow. It would be converted into an Empire. The states would be subordinate provinces to
Washington. And the 14th Amendment would accomplish this
with the reversion of citizenship. And
Lincoln was re-elected, and he was ready to end this, and that’s why they killed
him. Kennedy was ready to implement his
things; they would not let him be re-elected.
Martin: This is a total aside. Have you ever come across The Jefferson Bible?
Phelps: The
Jefferson Bible—and maybe you know this—is Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And Thomas Jefferson, being the Deist, being
the pagan that he was, cut out all the supernatural from those three
gospels. Jefferson was a Deist; he was
involved with the French Freemasons who were involved in the French Revolution,
and he was not here at the writing of our Protestant Constitution. So, the Lord put him out of the picture. Jefferson was just used to help with the
Revolution—because the Lord does use the unGodly for good things. But Jefferson copied much of the Declaration Of Independence from the Mechlenburg Declaration, written by
Calvinistic Presbyterians of North Carolina, when they seceded, when that county
of Mechlenburg seceded from the Colonies.
Martin: Never heard of it.
Phelps: Yes, you’ll find it in Presbyterian
writings. You can find it from D. James
Kennedy; he has a thing on it. And
Jefferson copied, at the end: “...and to this end we devote our lives, our
fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
That was
copied directly from the Mechlenburg
Declaration. Jefferson was a
plagiarist; he was a high Freemason; and he was out of here at the time of the
writing of our Constitution. And the reason why the people of Virginia did
elect him to office was because he was a State’s Rights man. He wanted limited powers in Washington, and
that was a good thing. And when
Jefferson was elected, he undid everything the king-president John Adams did,
with his Alien & Sedition Laws, because John Adams wanted to be a king, and
Jefferson undid it, and Jefferson got two terms for that.
Martin: I’m looking at some things that are a little
further back now. The Secreta Monita. What’s the significance of that?
Phelps: The Secret Instructions [excerpts at the end of this
interview] are the handbooks that
are given to the professed Jesuits, those under extreme oath.
[The oath is presented in full
at the end of this interview.] And
it tells them how to conduct their plans, subjugating peoples and nations to the
Jesuit General, and thus, to the temporal power of the Pope. It tells how they are to deceive. It shows how they are to swindle rich widows
out of their fortunes, like they did with Astor’s second wife who survived the
Titanic catastrophe. It shows their
general approach on how to do things.
This
particular book cannot be known, and if it’s ever published, they will deny it’s
existence. But when you see the works
that the Jesuits have done, it’s in complete agreement with the Secreta Monita.
There is a
very interesting section in Edwin R. Sherwin’s book The Engineer Core Of Hell, written in
1886 I believe—another suppressed work.
It’s usually in the archives of all the older libraries back here. And he shows how this Secreta Monita was discovered in South
America by a Mason, and the Mason managed to escape to a lodge after being
shot. He turned the Secreta Monita over to the lodge, and
then these certain Freemasons saw the Secreta Monita. There are certain low-level Freemasons who
believe that the Jesuit Order is their enemy, so that’s why it was taken to the
lodge and then published. But the
high-level Masons, of course, work with them.
The Secreta Monita was
discovered once that way. It was
published in Holland. Then, in 1857,
reprinted by England.
Martin: Pascal’s Provincial Letters had a
devastating impact on exposing the Jesuits.
Why?
Phelps: Blaise Pascal was a Huguenot, a French
Calvinist. So here we have another
fearless man. He doesn’t fear death;
he’s going to tell the truth. So Blaise
Pascal wrote a series of letters that were written to and from provincials, and
he wrote them in a satirical manner, that of course excited that wonderful
French mind. The French, of course, came
to the conclusion that this was absolutely the truth, and then they moved to
suppress the Jesuits again. But his Provincial Letters are considered a
classic. Blaise Pascal also wrote some
other great works, too.
Martin: Pope Ganganelli-Clement
XIV abolished the Order entirely in
1773, and was murdered as a result.
Phelps: Correct; he was poisoned.
Martin: The Order was similarly abolished 39 times
from different kingdoms throughout Europe.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that something was terribly wrong
with this group!
Phelps: Right. Are all those people bigots? Are all those people brainwashed bigots and
fanatical Protestants who abolished the Jesuit Order?
You find the
greatest resistance to the Jesuits in Catholic countries, by Catholic
monarchs. And that’s why the Roman
Catholic monarchs and nobility of today don’t dare resist them. The Kennedys won’t touch them. The monarchs of Europe won’t touch them. The
Hapsburgs won’t touch them, because the Jesuits have vindicated their power in
the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars—well, then they went to suppress
the Jesuits again in Europe and they were, for the most part, kicked-out of
Europe in the 1800s. All the nations of
Europe banned them. Germany banned them
in 1872. And so, World War I and II, the
second Thirty Years War, was pay-back for this.
And ever since then, nobody touches them.
Pope
Ganganelli abolished the Jesuits with a Papal Bull; the Jesuits call it a
“brief”. It is not a brief; it is in the
Library of the Bulls, and it is called Dominic Ac Redemptor Nostor.
That is the name of a bull. And
when he abolished them, he abolished them forever—that they were not to talk
about their abolition, that they were not to teach. He confiscated all of their wealth and land
and property. For the most part, the
Dominicans took it over, which is why the Dominicans had their penis cut off
during the French Revolution. That’s
what the Jacobins did to them. It was
payback by the Jesuits: “You don’t dare take our property from us, boy. And you don’t dare take Inquisition from
us.” Jacobins
killed nearly every Dominican in France.
Martin: Why was the assassination of William of
Orange so significant?
Phelps: Williams of Orange was the father of
religious liberty. William of Orange is
the man who gave the Jews the freedom to come to Amsterdam. And the Jews called Amsterdam, “the new
Jerusalem”. William of Orange was a
Catholic to begin with. Remember when he
was in the forest, hunting with the king of France, and the king of France lay
bare to him their plans to destroy all the Protestants in Holland, William kept
silent. And that’s why he was called
“William the taciturn” or “William the silent”.
So, he
harbored all of this in his heart, and he went back to Holland determined that
he would deliver the Calvinists and the Protestants from this annihilation. William went to Germany with his German wife,
and he, according to Motley in his The
Dutch Republic, raised an army of Germans and they did not succeed in
liberating Holland. And so, it was the
Dutch themselves who joined William of Orange in an attempt to liberate the
country, which they ultimately did as the “wild beggars of the sea”.
So, William
was a great inspiration. He delivered
flight from the seige of the fanatical Roman Catholic Spanish, lead by the
Jesuits, when the Lord providentially delivered and sent a strong wind over the
dikes, and flooded the whole area, and flooded the Spanish soldiers.
And then,
after that happened, He sent another strong West wind and blew the water back
over the dikes. This is a historical
fact! Why don’t we hear this in
history? For the same reason we don’t
hear when Louis XIV brought his army across the river into Holland to kill all
those Dutch, in 1672, right around there, that the river, right where the army
was crossing, thawed out, and the whole French army went to the bottom of the
river, as a result of the prayers of those Protestants of Holland. We’re not taught that either!
The
assassination of William of Orange was probably the second most significant act
of Jesuit dominance, next to the murder of Coligny at St. Bartholomew’s
Massacre. Because it was first St.
Bartholomew’s massacre, and then the murder of William of Orange. And, of course, William of Orange was shot by
a Jesuit-controlled assassin, Balthazar Girard, in his own house. And the last words of William, of course,
were: “God be merciful to these poor people.”
Martin: What is the Royal Institute of
International Affairs?
Phelps: The Royal Institute of International Affairs
is the same as the American Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The Royal Institute runs England and the
British Empire, what was once the extension of the British, just as the CFR runs
our country. They’re sister
organizations.
Martin: Where are they based?
Phelps: They’re based in London.
Martin: And who is their head; do you know?
Phelps: I don’t know right now. The John Birch Society wrote a lot about
that, and they did expose the CFR and the Royal Institute of International
Affairs. Allan Stang has written a lot
about that.
Martin: What was the “Gunpowder Plot” of 1605?
Phelps: The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was the Jesuits
attempt to destroy what William Howitt—and Howitt was the great writer who wrote
A Popular History Of Priestcraft,
1835—he said it was a Jesuit attempt to destroy our Great King Solomon, King
James I, along with the entire Protestant Parliament. Because remember, Elizabeth I had expelled
the Jesuits from her empire, and if they were ever caught they were to be drawn
and quartered.
After she
died, the conspiracy went on there that went on with William Cecil. They named Mary Queen of Scott’s son as the
King of England, rather than Elizabeth’s son, because Elizabeth had a son who
was the Earl of South Hampton, Wriothesley,
and that was the son of Edward Devere, who we know as William
Shakespeare.
There was no
William Shakespeare. The man was Edward
Devere. He ran the Globe Theater. He was the Lord Great Chamberlain to Queen
Elizabeth, and he secretly had a son who was the
Third Earl of South Hampton. He
was the rightful heir to the thrown, not King James VI of Scotland.
You can find
all this documented in two great works: the first is called Shakespeare Identified and the author is
Looney. The explosion of that book is
called This Star Of England, written
by Carlton and Dorothy Ogborn, in 1952, and it’s a 1200-page work, and in it
they explain all the plays of Shakespeare, and that they are, in the words of
Hamlet: “A brief abstract and chronicle of the times.” Nothing but history.
And then
there’s another book, Wasn’t Shakespeare
Someone Else?, written by Tweeny, and in that book he evaluates the 150
sonnets. In those sonnets Edward Devere
put his name: Vere or Uvre or Vere—he puts his name in acrostics throughout all
the sonnets. And the last couple sonnets
he puts his name in double acrostics.
It’s amazing, showing that he wrote the sonnets.
Martin: Why were the Jesuits so upset about the Edict
of Nantes, and what was it’s significance?
Phelps: Ok, the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes—it
can be spelled Nantes or Nantz. Anyway,
the Edict of Nantes was put forward by King Henry IV. King Henry IV was a Roman Catholic, but he
converted to Protestantism and he became a Huguenot. But he was not allowed to take the throne of
France until he renounced his Protestantism.
So, for the sake of the kingdom, he renounced his Protestantism, and in
1610, I believe, issued forth the Edict of Nantes.
The Edict of
Nantes guaranteed religious freedom to all the French. That included the Protestant, Calvinist,
Huguenots, which of course included those who would have followed Admiral
Coligny, who the Jesuits murdered with that she-wolf, Catherine de Medici. With the Edict of Nantes we have religious
liberty in France. This cannot be. France is a cornerstone of Jesuit power, so
it cannot allow this to be in place. The
Council of Trent condemns it, because it’s freedom of conscience.
So, after
they murder Henry IV with Ravaillac, when they stabbed him through his heart,
according to Sully in his memoirs, they murdered Henry IV for this, and also for
attempting to reinforce the Dutch. They
then, in 1685—when the Beatles are singing about the “Sun King” in their “white”
album, they’re singing about Louis XIV.
And that’s telling you that the Beatles are Jesuit-controlled. The Sun King, Louis XIV who reigned, who
rules over France for, I believe, 60 years, he, because of his Jesuit confessor,
Pere La Chaise, revokes the Edict of Nantes, and with that, no more religious
freedom in France.
And then
they sent their French dragons out and beheaded and killed every Huguenot they
could find, driving 500,000 Frenchmen out of the country, the wealth of France,
the manhood of France, all left for Holland and England. That destroyed France. From then on, France became a nothing
nation.
The French
Revolution could never have happened had not the Revocation of the Edict of
Nantes taken place. Because now, there’s
no Bible in France. And to this day, the French have never
published a French version of the Textus
Receptus. Number one, all French Bibles have been produced in foreign
countries, when they’ve been translated from the Greek Textus Receptus into French; France has never done
it. That shows the Jesuit power over
France to this day.
And the
French have probably been the most manly, the strongest, the most gracious, the
most determined in kicking the Jesuits out of their country. They’ve kicked them out, to my knowledge,
three times—and again, they come back, foment wars, kill off the rulers,
etc. Drive Eugene Sue into exile; he
dies of a broken heart. Drive Calvin
into exile; he can never return to France.
All the great Frenchmen are driven into exile.
So we have,
as American patriots, we have a great camaraderie for the French. They helped us in our American
Revolution. And why did they help
us? Because they’ve been expelled from
France. Why did Spain help us? Why did they help finance our
Revolution? The Jesuits had been
expelled from Spain. So payback came for
Spain and France, for helping this heretic, Protestant nation come into
existence, with the Napoleonic Wars, when they killed Louis XVI and drove the
Bubons from the Spanish thrown. That was
payback.
Martin:
For 30 years of war, from 1618-1648, you state that the Jesuits,
through Ferdinand II, killed-off 10 million people. That’s quite a statement.
Phelps:
That statement comes from Ridpath’s History Of The World, published in
1899. And that is his encyclopedia of
his history of the world. That was
common knowledge in 1899. The 30 Years
War was hell on Earth for Europe.
Two-thirds of Germany was brought back to Rome. It was leveled, plundered, and
destroyed.
Wallenstein
and Tilly were the fanatical Roman Catholic
generals who raped, pillaged, and plundered everything in their path. But the Lord raised up certain great generals
like Gustavus Adolphus from Sweden. He
was called the “Snow King” and he was the one who ultimately, he paved the way
for the victory of the 30 Years War.
But without
that Protestant victory of the 30 Years War, the peace of Westphalia, which the Pope was not invited to,
there would have been no modern era as we know it today. According to any historian, the modern era
begins in 1648. That is when the 80 Year
War in Holland ended with Spain. That is
when the 30 Years War ended with Ferdinand II and the Protestants of Germany,
and Sweden, and so-on.
1648 is the
wonderful year in which the Modern Era began, when inventors could go to Germany
and say: “Well, you know, maybe the Earth isn’t flat.” And maybe Leeuwenhoek could invent the
microscope in Holland, and now, later on, James Clerk Maxwell, who was a Bible-believing, Protestant
Presbyterian, he can write his treatise called Electricity And Magnetism, the father of
what we know today about electricity and magnetism. Now, science can blossom and bloom. Now we can have literature. Now we can have great writers, like Sir
Walter Scott, who writes great works like Ivanhoe and
Peveril Of The Peak. Now we can have Charles Dickens, another
Protestant, who writes A Tale Of Two Cities, one of London and
the other of Rome. We have great
literature surfacing as a result of the Modern Era.
But the
Jesuits, in their determination to destroy the Reformation and the Modern Era
and bring us back to the Dark Ages, seek to reverse the effects of the Modern
Era, and thus, what was brought about by the 30 Years War. And to know the 30 Years War is to understand
the second 30 Years War, which started in 1914 and ended in 1945.
Martin: In 1639, the Jesuits were also
expelled from Japan. Apparently the
Jesuits never forgot that.
Phelps: They never forgot it. For over 200 years they have been
expelled. And remember the words of
Lincoln: “The Jesuits never forget nor forsake.”
So, payback
time was coming for Japan. The Emperor
had expelled them, so that dynasty was targeted. Ultimately, the Emperor would be destroyed or
his dynasty would end. And so payback
time was the mass fire-bombings by the American Air Force, financed by the
Jesuits, as the Jesuits own Lockheed, Boeing, McDonald-Douglas, and Grumman, and
they used their B-29 to firebomb Japan to smithereens. You can get the fact that the Jesuits control
these aircraft companies from Avro Manhattan’s The Vatican Billions.
Martin: I’m trying to get a little more current here,
but some of this older stuff is also so fascinating, I’m going back and forth
here. Our readers are just going to have
to be a little flexible in their reading.
(laughter)
Phelps: Right.
Martin: In 1649 there was the Irish
Massacre. What was it, and let’s discuss
the hatred between the Protestants and Catholics in Ireland, as a result of the
Irish Massacre.
Phelps: Ok.
Of course, we believe in freedom of speech, freedom of conscience,
freedom of the press. That is an
outgrowth of Protestantism, because all Protestants were defending their right
to believe the Bible in the face of
Rome’s expectations to believe the priests and the decrees of the Popes.
Many of the
Irish were born-again. They came to know
the Lord. Much preaching was done up
there. In fact, Patrick, of St.
Patrick’s Day, was no Catholic. He was a
Protestant. And so, he was a great
Protestant preacher of Ireland, and many, many Irish came to know the Lord. And their point of location was primarily in
the North, in Northern Ireland, which today is Ulster, Belfast, etc.
Well, the
Jesuits, in fulfilling their Bloody Oath that we are making and waging
relentless war on all Protestants, and all political liberals, they hatched-out
the plot to kill all the Irish Protestants in Ireland with the O’Neil
family. And I wonder if that O’Neil
family was related to Tip O’Neil?
In 1641, the
massacre began, carried out by Roman Catholic nobles and the mobs in
Ireland. When they started that
massacre, it continued from 1641 to 1649.
The massacre ended when they killed 150,000, but they still taught the
Catholic children to kill the Protestant children. So, Irish Protestants were being massacred,
enmasse, for 8 years.
This is
NEVER told whenever anybody is ever talking about Oliver Cromwell, when
Cromwell came up with his Puritan Army and
ended that, when he took Drogheda, and killed every living thing in
Drogheda—men, women, children, animal, everything.
Ones say:
“Oh, the beast Oliver Cromwell. Look
what he did to Drogheda!” What about
those beasts killing those Irish Protestants for 8 years, bashing out the brains
of the little babies, smashing them up against the walls like they did, led by
the priests?
This was
just like they did in Croatia with the Serbs in World War II, when they
gouged-out the eyes of all the Serbians, where one particular priest had 23
kilos worth of eyes. They were doing the
same thing to the Irish Protestants.
So, when
Cromwell came up, and it was vengeance for the Irish Massacre, and the Irish
Massacre was NOT started by the Protestants, it was started by the Jesuits
according to Fox’s Book Of
Martyrs. And you can find the whole
narration there, which was a classic that all Englishmen used to read with the
King James Bible.
Martin: Do you believe that Great Britain is truly
Protestant-controlled, Jewish-controlled, or Jesuit-controlled?
Phelps: Jesuit-controlled.
Martin: Why?
Phelps: Well, let’s go back. To understand today we have to go back to the
Napoleonic Wars.
When
Napoleon came to power, he was brought to power in Corsica. When the Jesuits were suppressed, one of
their main outposts during their suppression was the Isle of Corsica. The Jesuits, remember, had finished the High
Rites of Freemasonry with Frederick the Great, and then used their French
Freemason Napoleon to execute their vengeance.
However, the
Jesuits were also protected during their suppression in England. A very wealthy landowner—and you can find
this in Ridpath’s History Of The
World—gave his wonderful, beautiful estate Stonyhurst
to the Jesuit Order. And from
then on, the Jesuits received protection by King George III, and you will find
that in Mitchell’s The Jesuits. Mitchell is an English historian.
Ok, so the
Jesuits are now protected by King George III.
Well, they’re going to uphold his throne. The Jesuits use the English army and navy in
the resistance of Napoleon, as both sides are controlled, so that the Jesuits
can control the outcome.
The end
result is that, after Napoleon accomplishes everything that the Jesuits want him
to do—the expulsion of the Knights of Malta, the driving of the Roman Catholics
from their throne, imprisoning the Pope for 5 years, etc.—Napoleon is then
ordered to abandon his army in the snows of Russia, killing all of those French
and German patriots, so that there are very few patriots left in Europe to
resist the tyranny coming in France with Louis XVIII, who the Jesuits will put
back on the throne.
Louis XVIII
was in exile, in England, in King George’s own parlor, waiting for the end of
the Napoleonic Wars. So, the Jesuits put
Louis XVIII back on the throne. He
readmitted the Jesuits, started the Inquisition, just like they did with
Ferdinand VII when they restored him to power in Spain after the Napoleonic
Wars.
And where do
these monarchs get their protection?
From King George III. King George
was used by the Jesuits to restore their power in Europe, after the Napoleonic
Wars, after they punished the Pope and the monarchs.
So, it’s
been, really, from 1795, right around there, that the Jesuits have controlled
England. They’ve controlled the Knights,
they’ve controlled the King. All
throughout the 18th century, now, England will never go to war with France
again. England will side with the French
during the Crimean War. England will be
on the side of the French during World Wars I & II. England and France are together, both
controlled by the Jesuits—even though France is predominantly a Catholic
country, and when England was, at least on it’s face, a Protestant country. Why should both be working together, both
having the same foreign policy.
Why? Because the Jesuits control
both countries.
When
Rothschild sent that note, via Roost, into London, saying that Napolean had won
the Battle of Waterloo, that’s when the stocks plummeted, and all the Jesuits
bought all the stocks up, there in London, and got control of the Bank of
England. The Jesuits then made London
their commercial center of the world, and Rome their religious center, aiming
that one day Jerusalem would be both.
So now the
Jesuits are in control of England. After
the Napoleonic Wars, we have the Congress of Vienna in 1815, and guess who’s
there? All the representatives of King
George. England is represented at the
Congress of Vienna, the settlement after the Napoleonic Wars. If England was truly Protestant, they would
have never went there. Now the Jesuits
are in control of England throughout the 1800s, and they use the British Empire
to further the power of the Pope.
England has been under Rome’s control, the Pope’s control, since, at the
very latest, 1850. And I say since
1795.
Martin: Let’s talk about Elizabeth II.
Phelps: Elizabeth II is a wicked, evil
queen. She is the head of the Knights of
Malta in England. She curtsies to the
Lord Mayor in Old London, and she goes and visits the Jesuits of Stonyhurst and
kisses their derrières. She has complete
allegiance to the Jesuits of Stonyhurst, and will do anything they tell her to
do, or they’ll get rid of her just like they got rid of all the rest of the
monarchs in Europe.
Martin: So you see her as a pawn.
Phelps: She’s just a pawn, sure. She’s nothing. Remember, White men rule the world. Evil, White, sodomite, homosexual men rule
the world, and these are the High Jesuits, with their High Knights of Malta and
High Freemasons, they rule. And these
women who are involved are just pawns in their game, like the queen, the queen
of Holland, just to give the appearance that these nations have a sovereign
monarch, when in fact, they’re just tools.
England has
done some awful, terrible things, but all of the things that they have done
increase and benefit the Jesuit Order.
They never resisted Napoleon III.
Napoleon III was a fanatical Roman Catholic Freemason, subject to the
Jesuits, who was the King of France for 18 years, second Empire. England never resisted him. They fought with him in the Crimean War. And Napoleon III dedicated all of his ships
to the Virgin Mary. England has been on
the side of the Jesuits since 1815, no later.
So, that means that the British Secret Service is totally working for
Rome, all throughout the 1800s.
Martin: How did the Jesuits regain control of the
Vatican in 1814?
Phelps: Remember that they were in control of
Napoleon. A Jesuit by the name of Abbie
Sieyes—you can find him, again, in Ridpath’s History Of The World—Abbie Sieyes was a
Jesuit-trained individual, and I believe he was a Jesuit. He was on the Directory, and he was also on
the Consulate; he was the second counsel.
Napoleon was the first; he was the second. He was the advisor and director of
Napoleon. Abbie Sieyes, being the Jesuit
that he was, ordered Napoleon to imprison the Pope for 5 years, and he did! So, the Pope was in prison for 5 years until
1814, when he restored the Jesuit Order.
The Pope, prior to that, was killed.
They brought him over the mountains of the Alps, and he died through that
debacle.
The Jesuits
thoroughly humiliated the papacy. They
used their French soldiers to overturn St. Peter’s chair, and they found,
written in Arabic: “There is no other God but Allah, and Mohammed is his
prophet.” And THAT is what is under St.
Peter’s chair today. That was stolen
from some kalif during the Crusades.
So, they
completely intimidated the Pope and showed their power. The Pope then restored them with a Papal
Bull, calling upon the vengeance of the Apostles Peter and Paul, blah, blah,
blah, for anyone who would ever suppress the Jesuit Order ever again. When the Jesuits were “reinstalled” in all
their power, that’s when they were in control of the Pope, and from then on they
have been.
Any Pope who
resists them gets punished or murdered.
And all the Popes know it. When
Pius IX wanted a liberal constitution for the Italian people in 1849, all of the
Italians were delighted. Here is a
liberal Pope; he’s going to give us constitutional rights; we’re going to have a
constitution.
The Jesuits
raised up a revolution with Garibaldi and their Freemasons, and drove
Pius IX from his throne. He had to stay in Gaeta for about a
year. When he returned to Rome, under
the protection of Napoleon III’s French army—actually, it was the republic’s
army that would later be his “army of the empire”—but they returned with a
French army, protecting the Pope, he became the most fanatical absolutist,
pursuant to the wishes of the Jesuits.
So, Piux IX
was punished. But the Popes who don’t
obey, like, what was it, In God’s
Name, the Pope who was murdered after 33 days, when he didn’t go along with
the Jesuit Order, they ended his life.
[Editor’s note: Eric is here referring to the very well
researched and deeply insightful 1984 Bantam Books gem (that’s very hard to
find, for “some” reason!) by David A. Yallop, called In God’s Name, which details the author’s thorough
investigation into the murder of Pope John Paul I the night of September 28-29,
1978 after John Paul had been digging into the massive web of corruption
surrounding the Vatican Bank. For all of
you who look for clues, note well the choosing of day 33 since his election for
the execution of the murder.]
When you
steal from the Vatican, like the Cardinal did at the PII Lodge, they killed him
(Kalvi), and they hanged the other guy, beginning with the admiralty
jurisdiction, at their first bridge of the sea.
So they have their assassins everywhere to carry out orders. They are machines. They are the perfect “Manchurian Candidates”
and they will kill popes, cardinals, presidents, kings, and kaisers, to maintain
Jesuit power. They are utterly
ruthless—just like they said they would be in the Protocols: “We are merciless.”
Martin: As you look around the world
today, who do you see opposing them?
Phelps: It’s interesting. I have a friend who makes quite a few trips
to Haiti. I told her about the
Jesuits. She got to questioning a few
people, and she found that Papa Doc had expelled the Jesuits from Haiti.
Martin: No kidding?
Phelps:
That’s right. Isn’t it
interesting, his son was also driven from power and the guy put in his place, I
believe it was Aristide, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a
complete pawn of the Pope and the Jesuit Order—for which reason, when those
Haitians wanted to drive Aristide from his power, this filthy, Jesuit-controlled
government in Washington put an embargo against Haiti, wrecking the
country. See how the U.S. government
uses its military, political, and financial power to maintain the temporal power
of the Pope? And that’s not only in
Haiti; it’s everywhere. Russia is
another example.
Martin: Don’t you see, coming up soon in Israel, some
of these powers coming head-to-head over the rebuilding of Solomon’s
Temple? Don’t you see some conflicts
with the powers that be?
Phelps: Which powers are you talking
about?
Martin: I don’t know; there seem to be so many
involved.
Phelps: We first have to remember the
creation of the nation of Israel. World
War I prepared the land for the people.
World War II prepared the people for the land. World War III, the battle of Armageddon, will
“prepare the people for their messiah”—with national repentance and realizing
that “Jesus, the messiah, is the savior and will deliver them”.
The present
government of Israel was set up by the High Masonic Rothschild-controlled Jews,
and Rothschild has had an alliance with the Jesuit General since 1876, with Adam
Weishaupt. This is the very same
Rothschild powers who betrayed the Jews into the hands of the Nazis, killing
many Jews all throughout Europe, betraying their own Jewish people. These are the very same powers who run the
nation of Israel today.
I read a
very interesting paragraph by Mark Lane in his book Plausible Denial when he tells about a
Jew in Israel who wrote about certain criminal Jews, involved with the Nazis,
who are now with the Mossad, something along those lines. The man who wrote the article was gunned-down
in front of his home.
So, Rome
controls the Israeli government. It
controls the Israeli government through the Mossad.
Who trained
the Mossad? Reinhard Gehlen.
We find that
fact in Loftus’ work The Secret War
Against The Jews in most telling, telling detail.
So what do
we have? We have high-level treason and
betrayal of the Jewish race; that is there in Israel today, by their own
leaders, who are loyal to Rome and the Jesuit Order. And to show this, we have a great big
Rockefeller edifice in Jerusalem; we have an ophthalmology center in Jerusalem
run by the Knights of Malta. There’s
nothing but Knights of Malta, high-level Freemasonry, and the Jesuit Order
running all of Israel.
So what’s
going to happen, I believe, with the Dome of the Rock is, that has got to be
removed—somehow, someway. It’s on the
Temple site; it has to be removed.
If I was the
Jesuit General, I would make— somehow, someway—American bombers do it. Because I want to create universal hatred for
this nation of the United States, because in the United States there are more
Protestants and more Jews than any country in the world, and “we’ve” got to kill
all those people. So what better way
than to create a Jihad, a Moslem fanatical attack against the United States,
coupled with a Chinese invasion from the East.
That’s what I think is going to happen.
The Jews are
not going to destroy that Temple site because, if they do, Rome will destroy
their efforts of rebuilding the Temple.
Because, if
Moslems control all of Jerusalem, that Temple will never be rebuilt. It has to stay in Jewish hands—because the
Jews, and rightfully so, need their own homeland. They’re entitled to the nation. And they haven’t had their own Temple of
worship. They are rightfully entitled to
that.
But what
they don’t know is that they are being used by the Jesuits to rebuild their own
Temple, that they would love to have rebuilt, for the Pope, so he can sit there
and be the man of sin, the Anti-Christ of the Book of Daniel, Chapter 9. That’s what I see coming for Israel.
The
assassination of Rabin? He wanted to
give away too much. He probably wanted
to give away some of Jerusalem. The
Jesuits will never allow that. So, his
bodyguards just step aside and the Mossad kills him. And nothing more is ever heard.
Rome’s—the
Jesuit General’s—international intelligence community carries out all high-level
assassinations, kills anybody who’s against their program. And Cromwell knew this, back in his day, and
that’s why he protected himself—160 of his finest “ironsides” as his bodyguards,
and no one got to him.
So anybody
who’s going to resist the Jesuit Order has to be doing it as a matter of a
“religious” conviction—being protected by God and good men who are loyal to
Him. If it’s simply political, with a
hired Secret Service, you can forget it.
Martin: Let’s go back to St. Patrick’s Cathedral in
New York. Why is that so
significant? You talk about the American
Pope. Again, that person is?
Phelps: Cardinal O’Connor.
Martin: Now, what is his role in the United
States?
Phelps: Ok, remember first that this title “American
Pope” was gotten from Conney’s work.
John Conney wrote The American
Pope, I believe in 1988, so a lot of this information is from that
document.
The American
Pope is the Cardinal of New York. He is
the most powerful Cardinal in the United States. He is what’s called “the military vicar”.
The military
vicar is in command of all of the military orders within the United States, they
being the Knights of Malta and the Knights of Columbus. He is also in command, and privately, of “the
Commission” because Cardinal Spellman was an intimate of Joe Kennedy, and Joe
Kennedy was an intimate of Frank Costello.
We also see
that it was Cardinal Spellman who enabled “Lucky” Luciano to be released from
the prison in New York, to return to Italy in 1946. And this was because of the Luciano Project
that I mentioned in my book. But Lucky
Luciano, his Mafia on the East Coast, worked in conjunction with the U.S. Navy,
supposedly to protect the Eastern seaboard from German U-boat attack.
So, as
payback? Cardinal Spellman releases
Lucky Luciano—that filthy, wicked, evil, heartless spiritual bastard, who
compelled young girls into prostitution, probably one of the cruelest things any
man could do. He is released and sent
back to Rome.
When the
Kennedy assassination comes up, the Cardinal needs a favor. After all, he’s released Luciano. So now the Mafia gets to participate: Jack
Ruby, Carlos Marcello, Santos Trafficante, all the High Dons participate. Why?
Because that Cardinal in New York controls the Commission.
And that
Commission, you know what it controls?
All of the trucking, all the supermarkets, it’s power is beyond our
wildest imagination, second only to the Knights of Malta. And, of course, they all control the Federal
Reserve Bank.
The Cardinal
controls the Federal Reserve Bank through the Council on Foreign Relations. The Council on Foreign Relations belongs to
the Cardinal.
Spellman was not a member of it, during his day, but two of the
most powerful members were Knights of Malta: Henry Luce and J. Peter Grace, and
also William F. Buckley, to this day.
William F. Buckley is indeed one of my enemies, because I name him, and
he is a powerful multi-billionaire who participated in the Kennedy
assassination, just like Iacocca, another Knight. Both of those men are subject to Cardinal
O’Connor and will do ANYTHING he says.
Martin: Do you know who is head of the Knights of
Malta, now?
Phelps: Yes; his name is Flynn. He took over when Grace died in ’93. Flynn is head of the American branch. The head of the worldwide branch, the
international Knights of Malta, is Andrew Bertie; he’s an Englishman. And you can find that in the National Catholic Reporter, when you go
after their various articles on the Knights of Malta.
Martin: Do the Knights of Malta actually meet,
actually hold meetings with the Jesuits?
Phelps: Oh, sure. Remember that
Alexander Haig is a powerful Knight of Malta. His brother is a Jesuit.
So, sure
they have meetings. The High Knights of
Malta, who meet in their palace on Aventin Hill, in Rome, of course, meet with
the Jesuit General, and so on. And Count
von Hoensbroech, who was a German Noble who became a Jesuit for 14 years—he
wrote a two-volume work called Fourteen
Years A Jesuit. His father was a
Knight of Malta. Yes, the Jesuits work
in conjunction and have regular meetings with the Knights of Malta.
The Knights
control the money. The Knights control
the banks. They control the Bank of
Canada, Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of England; they control the banking. They were the ones who were behind the
sinking of the Titanic, with the creation of the White Star Line, J.P. Morgan
and others.
Martin: Alan Greenspan, then, would be?
Phelps: Alan Greenspan is a Jew, probably a
Freemason, because he is the leader of the Temple called the “Federal Reserve
Bank” and they always put Jews in the forefront—so that they can blame all of
what they do on the Jewish race in this country, to create an anti-Semitism
everywhere, just like Charles Coughlin, the radio Jesuit priest of the ’30s
did.
Greenspan,
Bloomenthal, Warburg, and all those Jews need to be publicly rebuked, because
they are creating the mass genocide of the Jewish race in the United
States. The Jews are being blamed right
now for the foreign policy in Bosnia.
Madeline Albright—she’s a Jew—they’re blaming her for what’s going on in
Serbia. I’ve got a good Serbian friend
who blames her. I said she’s just a pawn
of the Jesuit CFR. Don’t blame the
Jewish people. It’s these Jewish “pawns”
who are loyal to the Pope and the Jesuits who are doing this.
The Zionists—the Jesuits are the Great
Zionists. They control all of the
historical High Zionists—Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir. Zionism is a Masonic term, coined by the
Jesuits. They are the rulers; they are
the Protocols; they are the Elders of
Zion. So the Zionists are, indeed, evil
and wicked; but they are controlled by Rome.
The Jews are not all Zionists.
I remember
when I went to Jerusalem and Israel in 1976, and a lady said to this particular
man that I had met: “You’re more of a
Zionist than we are!” And I thought:
“What does that mean? I don’t understand
that.”
I only later
understood why Yasser Arafat says he doesn’t hate the Jews; he can’t stand the
Zionists. And I’m thinking: “What’s the
difference?” I, later, learned that
there is a great difference
between those Zionists and the other Jews.
The Orthodox Jews can’t stand the Zionists.
So what’s
the difference? The Zionists are
socialist communists, controlled by Rome.
They are atheists, just like the Jesuits, although they’re being used to
rebuild the nation of Israel. They are
the enemies of the Jewish people, per se.
There’s no
conflict going on in the Middle East.
There’s no conflict going on with the Arab nations. All of the Arab nations are under the command
of Masonic kings or iotollas. Saddam
Hussein is no enemy of George Bush; they’re both brothers, brothers of the
lodge. That whole thing was set up to
kill off a whole bunch of Arabs for the protection of the Zionist state of
Israel.
Martin: Well, Bush and Saddam were business
partners. We’ve covered that in recent
past issues of our newspaper.
Phelps: Sure.
That’s why they never killed Saddam.
They could have easily killed him.
The CIA can kill anybody they want to.
They could have easily killed Saddam and got out. They could use their own Arab agents in
there. Saddam was a very important
tool.
Martin: Still is.
Phelps: Still is, sure. They keep the Arab peoples and nations at bay
by controlling them through their leaders.
Or, when they start to get out of control in their Moslem fanaticism,
they then foment a war and kill off a whole bunch of them. Make sense?
Martin: There was a statement you made in your book
about the Jesuits controlling the Nation of Islam, and that was almost a
surprising statement to read. I would
think that someone like Louis Farrakhan would be pretty adamant.
Phelps: Yeah, he would hate me for that one. Well, let’s think a little bit here:
Chicago is
ruled by the Archbishop of Chicago, a Cardinal.
It was Cody; I don’t know who it is now.
Do you think anything goes down in Chicago without the Cardinal’s
approval?
Where was
the Nation of Islam founded?
Chicago.
Where is
Louis Farrakhan’s—that murderer’s—mansion?
Chicago. He lives like a
king.
What does he
hand out? He hands out the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion
to all of deluded Black Nation of Islam people, so that they can hate the Jews,
just like the Klu Klux Klan.
That’s right. Those three little tidbits, right there,
prove that the Nation of Islam is totally under Jesuit control. They are going to be used to foment anarchy
and agitation, because they have an army called “the fruit of Islam”, and they
have millions of rounds stored in all the major cities—guns stored
everywhere, so that they can start
the race war. And when that happens, you
see, then the brothers in Washington can implement Martial Law, suspend the Constitution, and now the Jesuits have
what they want.
So, they use these Blacks in the North, who
hate the White people, for their own destruction, for the destruction of the
Black people themselves. And the Nation
of Islam is part of that.
When I was
in the Air Force, and in jail for about 10-15 days, about 10 years ago, the
Nation of Islam was paramount, or tried to be paramount, there. All the Blacks in jail become Moslems. It’s a “hate the White man” religion. Every White man is a White, blue-eyed
Devil. And they’re playing—the Zodiac
killer, back in California many years ago, all Moslems. So it’s a “hate the White man” religion,
designed to foment agitation and unrest.
Martin
Lucifer King was intimately involved with them.
The only problem is, Malcolm X got on to it. He realized he was being used and he
separated from it. Then he ceased to be
an agitator.
Martin: Malcolm X was way ahead of his time.
Phelps: Yeah.
Malcolm X was a good guy.
Martin: Yes, he was.
Phelps: Malcolm X, even though he was used by the
Jesuits, because he hated the King James
Bible, he was a great agitator. When
he went to Mecca, he changed.
Martin: Yes, he did.
Phelps: And when he came back, he stopped being an
agitator. He stopped hating the White
man. He started to set up the
African-American Movement. And as a
result, he was assassinated by the high leaders of the FBI and the Nation of
Islam.
And what do
they both have in common? High-level
Shriner Freemasonry.
And so, we
have the Masons in control of the Nation of Islam and the Klu Klux Klan—one
agitating Blacks, and the other agitating Whites, to the glory of the Jesuit
Order. The other Civil Rights Movement
had the Jesuits behind that—with LaFarge.
Jesuit LeFarge was a great mover and shaker of the Civil Rights
Movements. And that agitation resulted
in amalgamation, race-mixing, the destruction of a White race and a Black race,
producing a nation of hybrids that cannot maintain free government.
That is what
they proposed to do in the first Reconstruction, but it failed; so they
succeeded in the second Reconstruction in the ’60s. The Jesuits are masters of the races. They know their strengths and their
weaknesses.
The only
race who successfully resisted the Jesuit Order is the White, Anglo-Celtic,
Saxon race, with a Bible in one hand
and a gun in the other. And so they’ve
got to take the Bible away, they’ve
got to take the gun away, and they’ve got to destroy that race. And that’s what they are essentially doing
here. I know that’s a racist statement,
but I’m sorry, it’s just the way it is.
That’s history, and that’s what they’re doing.
Martin: The relationship between
Communism and Freemasonry. Where do the
Jesuits fit into Communism and Freemasonry?
Phelps:
Let’s, first of all, look at the relationship of Jesuitism to
Communism. The Jesuits perfected the
tenets of Communism on their reductions in Paraguay, for 150 years, from
1600-1750.
Martin: What is a reduction?
Phelps: A reduction is a commune. In Israel they would call it a kibbutz. In Joseph Stalin’s Russia they would call it
a commune. In New York they call it a
village. In France, Paris, they called
it a commune. It’s communal living where
everybody is equal in their finances, in the labors; you have no great, no
small, no rich, no poor—everybody is small, and everybody is poor, and everybody
is controlled by a dictator. That’s the
essence of Communism.
The Jesuits,
on the reductions in Paraguay, which were the communes, had a central bank, and
it was “each according to their ability and each according to their need”. And so, the Guarani Indians that were the
subjects—and there were some 200,000 of these South American Indian natives who
were slaves of the Jesuits, putting their goods into world commerce and
trade. They were living under the tenets
of Communism, perfected by the Jesuits, as outlined in Plato’s Republic and Sir Thomas Moore’s Utopia.
The Jesuits perfected it on their reductions.
With that,
they then introduced Communism in 1848 through Karl Marx. They tutored him in the British Museum,
according to Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit.
So Marx, the Jewish Freemason, was to be
the one to put forward this Communism for the world, so that Communism would
look like a Jewish brain-child, so that Communism could be blamed on the
Jews. Well, what’s not told is that the Jews involved in
the implementing of Communism were Masonic Jews. Karl Marx was a 33rd-degree Freemason, a
worshipper of Lucifer, whose father wanted nothing to do with him, because his
father was a Baptist preacher.
Jewish
Freemasonry, controlled by the Jesuits, implemented Communism in Russia. Lenin, the half-Jew, was a Freemason. That civil war that took place from
1917-1922, for 5 years, was given the appearance that it was primarily
Yiddish. I mean, they’re on the streets
of Russia talking Yiddish; they had Yiddish signs; and it was wanted to give the
impression to the world that this revolution was of Jewish origin.
For 10 years
after the revolution, the Jews faired very well, but in 1922, Joseph Stalin,
that great Jew-hater, who was educated by Jesuits in Georgia—which was a country
south of Russia and, therefore, the Emperor’s banning of the Jesuits from
Russia, his Ukase, did not reach to
Georgia. So the Jesuits stayed in
Georgia, trained Joseph Stalin, brought him in after the Revolution, and made
him Secretary of the Communist Party in 1922, until he died in 1953.
The Jesuits
used Freemasonry and, of course, Stalin was also a brother Freemason. They used Freemasonry to implement Communism
in Russia, and from there, China, and from there, throughout the world.
When Germany
had their revolution after World War I, their Communist revolution—remember,
they requested an armistice—they had never been beaten on the field of
battle.
The Germans
were foisted into that war; they never started World War I. It was started by France and Russia and
England, for the purpose of destroying Germany, because Germany had expelled the
Jesuits. During that war, the Germans
requested an armistice to stop this Communist revolution in Germany.
And who lead
the revolution? The German
Freemasons.
According to
the Kaiser, in his memoirs, it was German Freemasonry that got him off his
throne and deposed him. He had to go
into exile in Holland. He wrote his
memoirs in 1935.
So the
relationship between Jesuitism, Communism and Freemasonry we see evolving and
expanding from the 1600s to the ultimate achievement in the Bolshevik
Revolution.
In my book,
I parallel the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution, and they are
identical. It was French Freemasonry
that caused the French Revolution and the Jacobins, and it was the Freemasons in
Russia, with Bolsheviks, who caused the Russian Revolution, with their
Bolsheviks, leading and ending in Joseph Stalin. In France, it ended with Napoleon; in Russia,
it ended with Stalin. And so, that’s the
relationship there.
Martin: Why was Eugene Sue so significant?
Phelps: Eugene Sue wrote his masterpiece The Wandering Jew, and in that
masterpiece he weaves a fantastic story from India to England to France, of the
power of the Jesuit Order and their attempt to destroy the Rennepont family, a
French Huguenot Protestant family, and acquire a fortune that’s due to be
inherited by the members of that family on a certain day, at a certain time, in
a certain year.
Well, that
fortune is held, in trust, by a Jew, for which reason the book is named The Wandering Jew. It tells of the power of the Jesuit Order in
that book, and how the Jesuits mercilessly killed all these members of the
Rennepont family so they could not inherit
their fortune.
The only
one, I believe, they didn’t kill was a priest, whose name was Gabriel, who was a
decent and a righteous Catholic priest who repudiated the Jesuit Order. He ordered the Jew to burn all the
securities, that totaled something like $212 million, that would have rightfully
been this French family’s.
So, the
Jesuits didn’t get it, nor did the French family get it. It’s written with such drama and feeling that
you cannot put this book down. It was
translated into many different languages.
As a result, the French, and other nations, had their French Revolution,
the second French Revolution of 1848.
But because it was not lead by Godly men, it benefited the Jesuits.
Whenever you
have a revolution led by unGodly men, it’s just like a man who’s on a horse,
trying to be pushed off the horse, and as he’s pushed off, another dictator
takes his place. That’s exactly what
happened in France, and Italy, and the nations who were involved in that second
French Revolution.
But Eugene
Sue had motivated the people of France to expel the Jesuits, and they were
finally expelled in 1880 by a French Freemason, in the 3rd Republic, Leon
Gambetta. So, they’re all Freemasons who
resist them, but they pay with their lives, like Garfield, like Gambetta,
Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Roosevelt really didn’t resist them; he just was killed by them.
Martin: Again, I’m jumping around.
Phelps: Ok.
Martin: What was Operation Mongoose?
Phelps: Operation Mongoose was purely “black ops” in
the words of Fletcher Prouty. Of course,
Fletcher Prouty I consider the authority on what Operation Mongoose was. Operation Mongoose was to “give the
appearance” of resistance to Castro’s government by attacking Cuba but, in
effect, solidified his reign there.
That’s what it ultimately produced.
And that’s what the Knights and the CIA ultimately wanted. Ok?
The
agreement that Kennedy made over the Cuban missile crisis in 1962—first of all,
there was no missile crisis. There’s no
such thing as nuclear war. There’s no
such thing as a nuclear attack. That’s
all a hoax. It’s just as much a hoax as
going and landing on the Moon. It’s a
hoax.
Nuclear war,
that fear, was the basis for the Cuban missile crisis. And out of that hoax, Kennedy strikes a
secret deal with Khrushchev that, if you keep the missiles out of Cuba, we won’t
bother Castro anymore. Well, that’s what
the Jesuits wanted anyway. They wanted
to solidify Castro in power.
So that
whole theatrical performance solidified Castro’s power in Cuba. And the question is: Why would the Jesuits create this fanatical
power in Cuba, run down the Cuban people, put them in poverty, imprison them at
random, create a living hell down there, drive out the Mafia—the Mafia could no
longer have their casinos in Havana?
Why would
the Mafia give up their casinos? For the
international drug trade to be developing out of Vietnam.
Therefore,
if the Mafia is leaving, and we don’t have a bunch of American tourists going
down to Cuba anymore, and Cuba is really a secret country—the Bible is not allowed there, missionaries
are not allowed in, obviously under Jesuit control, Castro was trained by
Jesuits—what’s the purpose of Cuba under Castro?
It’s purpose is as a landing base for
foreign invasion. They have hundreds of
vehicles, underground, in underground caves there, ready for a massive invasion
to the East Coast, primarily the South.
Because the last of the Protestants in this country are in the
South.
Cuba will
always be under a dictator and will never go back to freedom, because it is to
be a landing base. And you know
what? It could very well be a landing
base for a Jihad that the Moslems will foment against us, because they’ll come
right across from Africa to Cuba, get reinforced, and then go landing into
Florida, with all their 5th-Column Cubans in Florida and Miami right now. Sounds wild, but—.
Martin: That’s a sobering thought.
Phelps: Yes, it is.
Sounds wild, but I’m telling you, all the geography is in place. However, they can’t pull this all off until
they get your guns. So that’s why
they’re constantly creating these gun issues—people shooting people, the
Columbine High School bit—to justify the confiscation of all the guns. And when that happens, then they can do what
they want to do.
Martin: There are a lot of strong Americans out
there.
Phelps: The only problem is this: they’re not united
and they can’t be lead. Americans are
leaderless because they do not follow.
They all think their opinions are equal, and they’re not. I would follow General Patton anywhere. I wouldn’t question an order of his. We don’t have men like that today, for the
most part, because we don’t have leaders like that today.
Martin: I found your account of Patton’s
assassination fascinating, also your speaking of the Jesuits’ poisoning of
him.
Phelps: A member of the OSS came out in the Spotlight [newspaper] and said that. His name was Zapata, that agent. He said he was given a contract on Patton for
$10,000. He didn’t kill him, but he
knows the guy who did. So, Patton was
murdered, and General Vlasov was murdered, and both of them hated the Jesuits’
“Grand Inquisitor”, Joseph Stalin. They
would have united together to eradicate Russia of that dictator, but the Jesuits
would not have it because Russia is theirs.
They must control the Orthodox Church to bring it back to Rome. That’s why they got rid of the
Romanoffs.
Martin: Patton’s take-out was ordered by “Wild” Bill
Donovan? Did I read that?
Phelps: That’s right. Wild Bill Donovan was the head of the OSS at
the time. And if you get Anthony K.
Brown’s The Last Hero, it’s on Wild
Bill Donovan. He is in the Vatican at
the end of his life, in a picture, walking in the Vatican to receive one of the
highest medals from the Pope, for a “lifetime” of intelligence service to the
Vatican. That is in The Last Hero and the picture is
mesmerizing. I want to put it in my
book.
The OSS is
nothing but an arm of the CIA and the Vatican, and that’s why they took out
Kenendy. They kill all the generals who
don’t “play ball”.
Martin: Let’s talk about the CIA and the FBI some
more. What can you tell me about their
relationship to Count von Kolvenbach?
Phelps: Well, based upon the past, if the CIA and the
FBI carried out the assassination under Spellman, and Janseens was the Jesuit
General then, the same power structure is in place. So, von Kolvenbach, through his Knights of
Malta and Jesuits, control the FBI and CIA.
And his liason of control is now Cardinal O’Connor in New York.
Martin: Some time ago, with Gunther Russbacher and
others, there was talk about a split in the CIA, of different factions. Some even say there is a third faction in the
CIA that has split off. What’s your
opinion about factional divisions within the CIA?
Phelps: I think it’s true. I know that Angelton was the mole. Angelton was the one who betrayed all those
CIA agents in Russia, in which the vast majority of them were killed, when he
gave all that information to that KGB kingpin on a farm in New York, in a van,
stuffed with all the highest, top secret CIA documents. Ok?
Colby comes
along as the Director of the CIA—I know his brother, he lives nearby me—Colby
comes along as the Director of the CIA and what does he do? He fires Angelton. Bad news for Colby.
Martin: Yeah, it was.
Phelps: They filled him up with lead. Eric Timm, he was also against Angleton; he
was history. That’s all told in Anthony
K. Brown’s work Treason In The
Blood. There’s a whole little
chapter on Eric Timm and some of the other guys in the CIA who were against
Angelton. They all died. So there’s a faction in the CIA that knows
that something is rotten in Denmark, and they don’t quite know what it is. Hopefully, they’ll read my book and see that
the CIA is just an arm of the Jesuit Order and Knights of Malta, carrying out
the Council of Trent and the Pope’s temple power, and will REVOLT, and start to
tell the truth themselves.
It’s the
same way in the FBI. My father lectured
at the FBI Academy. He wanted to be in
the FBI, but his parents were Communists, so he was not let in by J. Edgar
Hoover. But the FBI has low-level agents
who wonder just what’s going on. A lot
of them didn’t approve of what happened in Waco.
They need to come out and tell the
truth. This whole “house of cards”—and
that’s what it is, this is not an undefeatable, invincible monster—it’s a house
of cards; it plays on FEAR. If men would
tell the truth, and come out and tell what they know, and not be afraid, this
whole house of cards would crumble.
That’s what they need to do.
Martin: Who is Avery Dulles?
Phelps:
Avery Dulles is the son
of John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State, I believe, under Eisenhower. Avery Dulles is a Jesuit, and he was the
nephew of the head of the CIA during the Kennedy assassination, who was Allan
Dulles. And Allan Dulles was a
Freemason, also called “the gentleman spy” in the book The Gentleman Spy.
Martin: What was Angelton’s role in the Kennedy
assassination?
Phelps:
Angelton was the one who was to “investigate” it on the part of the
CIA. (laughter)
Angelton
also, I believe, was liaison to the Warren Commission—no, that was Dulles. But Angelton
and Dulles were working together on that, because Angelton
was the Chief of Counter-Intelligence and he manned the Vatican Desk,
and he manned the Israeli Desk.
See how
they’re maintaining the Zionists in power, with the Israeli Desk? So, they saved Israel’s hide in the ’73 war,
because Kissinger almost lost it for them.
Alexander Haig gave them, the Israelis, those
anti-tank missiles, and got them in their hands before the Egyptians got into
Israel and disabled them. That was
Alexander Haig, Knight of Malta, for which reason he was also the Supreme Allied
Commander for NATO, promoted over 260 of his peers.
Martin: Do you know anything about Haig’s statement
“I’m in charge now!” Do you remember
that?
Phelps: Yeah, I do.
I don’t know all of the implications, but I’m sure it fits in with him
being, in fact, in charge in the Nixon White House.
Martin:
Ok, I want to go back to the Kennedy assassination, and I’m going to
just mention some names: Clay Shaw, Jim
Garrison, J. Peter Grace, Henry Luce, E. Howard Hunt, John McCone. Why are they so important to this story?
Phelps: Give me one and we’ll start with one.
Martin: Let’s start with Clay Shaw.
Phelps: Clay Shaw was a Knight of Malta. He was the head of the international trade
mart in New Orleans. Roman Catholic,
homosexual, multi-millionaire, lived lavishly, etc. Clay Shaw was the personal friend of David
Ferry. David Ferry was a CIA agent, and
was also a pilot for Carlos Marchello—the CIA and the Mafia together. Clay Shaw also was a friend of Lee Oswald,
and Garrison proves it.
Here we have
Clay Shaw, who was in the CIA. It was
admitted by Richard Helms that Clay Shaw was a “contract agent” for the CIA, and
the highest security involved in the Kennedy assassination, because he gets an
attorney for Dean Andrews who’s subpoenaed by Garrison. So, if Clay Shaw is involved, he’s a Knight
of Malta, he’s high CIA, and he can’t go down.
That’s why
the court was packed. The judge was
biased against Garrison. The defense of
Shaw was unlike any before. There was a
guy behind, whispering to the defense attorney.
That’s not allowed in a courtroom defense.
Shaw HAD to
be found innocent, because if he was found guilty, now the CIA is going
down. Now we’re going to have a
revolution. So, Clay Shaw had to be
found not guilty.
But it
wasn’t many years after that, he died under suspicious conditions and never had
an autopsy. He died of lung cancer. But he’s part of the brotherhood, and the
Jesuits are very powerful in New Orleans.
Martin: John McCone.
Phelps: John McCone was a very powerful
industrialist, and one who was part of the military-industrial complex, before
he became the head of the CIA. He later
went on to become part of, I believe, ITT.
John McCone
was another Knight of Malta, head of the CIA, and participated in the Kennedy
assassination by virtue of him being its head.
And he’s Knight of Malta.
Angelton is
a Knight of Malta. Henry Luce is a
Knight of Malta. William F. Buckley is a
Knight of Malta. And William F. Buckley
then ran the National Review—and what
does he do? He blames Oswald as the lone
assassin.
Where was
the picture concocted, for Oswald, as though his head is put on this body that’s
not his? It was concocted, probably, I
believe, in the Time-Life Building,
when they did that, because Time-Life
has a whole bunch of CIA agents in it.
And, remember, Time-Life is
right across the street from St. Patrick’s Cathedral, where Cardinal Spellman
was ruling from.
So, Spellman
was overseeing the whole thing, with Henry Luce. And, if you get Luce And His Empire, there is a picture
in there of Cardinal Spellman, Luce, Grace, Clare Boothe Luce, and Dean Rusk, on
the 1963, 4-year anniversary of Time
magazine in the Waldorf Astoria, only months before the Kennedy
assassination. And there’s Dean Rusk,
the architect of the Vietnam War, according to the words of his own son.
Ok, who’s
the other one? Howard Hunt. Howard Hunt is a CIA agent, of course.
He said he
was never in Dallas the day of the assassination, but Mark Lane proved that he
was. Thank God for Mark Lane. Here’s another Jew getting in the way of the
Vatican. Just like Daniel
Ellsberg—here’s another Jew getting in the way of the Vatican’s Vietnam War.
You see Jews
who are getting in the way of the Vatican, and the Jesuits are furious about
it. So here’s Mark Lane; he’s openly
defeated William F. Buckley in court before; now he proves that Howard Hunt is a
CIA agent, in Dallas the day of the assassination.
The jury
came forward with that verdict, and who is Howard Hunt? Howard Hunt is a personal friend of Henry
Luce, a correspondent for Time-Life. He’s a personal friend of William F.
Buckley. He goes to one of Buckley’s
parties at the New York Yacht Club. He
knows them both. He knows two of the
High Knights.
And guess
what? Guess what Howard Hunt is
called? He’s called “Knight”. (laughter)
I wonder
what he was—Knight of Columbus, or whatever.
But he’s involved with the brotherhood.
So he was
there on the day of the assassination, intimate with Luce and Buckley. Just as the chart says on my web page. And by the way, your readers need to look at
my vaticanassassins.org web
page.
Martin: I’m going to mention a few more names.
Phelps: Oh, J. Peter Grace we forgot. J. Peter Grace was the head of the Knights of
Malta in 1963. He is the head of W. R.
Grace, and he’s one of the largest
shipping tycoons in the world, in control of all the shipping in South
America. Grace is a powerful man, or was
a powerful man.
Martin: Has anyone filled his shoes?
Phelps: Yes, Flynn is head of the Knights of Malta
now, down in Florida where there new office is.
They moved from New York to Florida, I think Bocca
Raton. They have 11 Knights of
Malta on the W. R. Grace board.
And, of
course, guess who owns Taco Bell? W. R.
Grace.
So now we
see W. R. Grace involved in the poisoning of America with fast-food chains, so
everybody gets heart disease, clogged arteries, so they can go to bypass surgery
and further enrich the medical profession, while carrying out their medical
inquisition. Isn’t that clear? So not only are they going to kill all of the
American people, but they’re going to make billions doing it.
Martin: I’m sure they’re laughing all the way to the
bank.
Phelps: They sure are. And where Grace did his banking, W. R. Grace,
they did their banking at Chemical Bank in New York. Guess who runs Chemical Bank? Knights of Malta.
Martin: Jim Garrison was a very brave guy.
Phelps: Yes, he was.
He lost his marriage. He lost his
children. He suffered greatly through
this, doing what he did.
Martin: Ok, I want to talk about the movie JFK.
You mention the Jesuits, in control of Time-Warner, produced Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.
What was the reason for this? To
just further cement, subliminally in the minds of the American people, their
absolute power?
Phelps: I think that might be part of it. But, I think it’s a test. It’s a test: tell the American people the
truth to see what they will do about it.
And they did nothing.
And that was
the end of Garrison, or Kevin Costner’s speech, in the courtroom, when he said
“It’s up to you.” And he looks directly
into the camera. So, he’s looking at
us.
That was a
call to do something about it. It’s a
test. What will we do? And you know what was done? Nothing.
The men in power, the men in the know, the men who could have said
something, did nothing. So that was the
purpose of the movie.
Meanwhile,
they interweave all these Jesuit subliminals all throughout the movie: “Black is white, white is black”—when
Garrison is at the restaurant, talking to his people—that’s Ignatius
Loyola. David Ferry shows pictures of
his Catholic uniform there, and Satan pictures in his apartment, all very much
Jesuitism.
There were a
couple of other things I noticed that I can’t quite remember. Oh, they had a subliminal “study the
past”. It goes on there, it’s on a
building or something, “study the past”.
And they said: “It’s like Caesar; he’s not in the loop.” Well, Caesar was murdered by those close to
him. And the ones who murdered Caesar
were the priests of Rome. There’s all
kinds of subliminals in that movie which point to the power of the Jesuit Order,
all over. The assassination—right after
they take his body out of Parkland Hospital, they’ve got the cross on it, the
crucifix. That is a very unique, Jesuit
crucifix.
When I was
at a Jesuit retreat in Redding one day, I just wanted to walk through the
place. I wanted to see where these
sinners rule from, so I thought I would walk through the place and check out the
rooms. It just so happened that the
Jesuits were on the second floor, by themselves. So I went to the first floor and the third
floor, and looked into the rooms. They
were little, tiny rooms, and on every bed is a crucifix with a crucified person
on it. It’s not the Jesus Christ of the
Bible; it’s their Jesus Christ. And that’s the same exact crucifix that was
put on the coffin, in the movie, when they’re shipping the coffin out.
And get a
load of this: the guy who came to give Kennedy the Last Rites, Oscar Hubert, his
superior was the Bishop of Dallas, by the name of Thomas Gorman. Bishop Thomas Gorman was a Knight of Malta,
answerable directly to Cardinal Spellman.
Martin: Let’s talk about Cardinal Spellman. Who was he?
Why was he so important? You say,
in the book, he really was the man behind it.
Phelps: Right.
Martin: Why do you say that?
Phelps: Cardinal Spellman was, first, very much
involved in politics all of his life.
Remember, he was trained by the Jesuits at Fordham. He was trained by Jesuits at the American
College in Rome. When he came back here,
he was taken care of by Nicholas Brady and his wife, multi-billionaires in
control of Union Carbide, and various banks, multi-multi-billionaires.
Spellman was
part of getting FDR into office, although I believe Cardinal Hayes was the
Cardinal. Guess who FDR names as his
international agent, during World War II?
Francis Spellman. Francis
Spellman was throughout the war-front during World War II, going to and from the
Vatican, the Allied Army, etc. And, with
that, he built a huge network of contacts.
He, also, of course, had contacts with the mob.
So, by the
time of the Kennedy assassination, we have Cardinal Spellman here, who helped
the Nazis get into the United States, with the FBI.
I met one of
those Nazis about 6 months ago. I call
him Pete. He showed me his Nazi SS
overcoat, which is a beautiful overcoat—I’d love to have it. And it was the FBI who brought all of these
High Nazis in and resettled them, and gave them money to settle.
Who did
that? Francis Spellman, by helping those
criminals escape the theater of Europe so that they could not be
prosecuted. It’s called the “Vatican
Ratline” that Loftus writes about in his Unholy Trinity.
So, Spellman
is involved in getting the SS out, helping the Ustashis. Spellman is involved in this whole second 30
Years War of the Vatican in Europe, outlined by Edmond Paris in his Vatican Against Europe.
And so, he
is in a perfect place to carry out the assassination. He has contacts with the Knights of Malta in
England, with the Knights he controls in America; he has his Jesuit contacts who
trained him at Fordham and Rome; he was a personal friend of Pius XII during the
war.
He was a
personal friend of the secret cold-warrior, Montini, Pius VI. So he is the perfect man, with all of the
connections, to carry it out. He has
contacts with the CIA, the Knights from the CIA, the Knights from the FBI, in
the person of Carthe DeLouthe, who still lives.
He had contacts with high-level Freemasonry, with people like J. Edgar
Hoover and their raving against Communism, Communism, Communism—international,
Godless, Jew Communism.
He and
Hoover are bosom, probably bed, partners.
And so, Spellman is in a place to be in control of the CIA, the FBI, the
Mafia, and through Freemasonry, the Dallas Police Department—like they control
every major city’s P.D. And so he
carries it out.
And then
he’s also in control of the press, in control of Time and Life, with Henry Luce, so the press
never gets it. He’s in control of CBS,
with a man named Frank Shakespeare, who was the head of CBS at the time.
So you think
Walter Cronkite is going to tell us the truth? No way.
He’s in control of CBS, NBC, ABC.
They have stocks in it, for heaven’s sake. So, there’s no way the story’s getting
out. And he’s in control of the CIA to
hit and kill anybody who wants to come out and tell the truth, which is why
there’s over a hundred dead witnesses over the last 30 years.
That’s why
they took out Fensterwald, in 1992, outlined in the book by that CIA agent First Hand Knowledge, by Morrow.
He was a CIA agent. He
was in on the Kennedy assassination. He
completely outlines it in his book, and he tells of that relationship of the CIA
to killing Fensterwald. He dedicates his
book to Fensterwald.
So, how’s it
getting out? This is only getting out by
fearless preachers, who preach the Word of God, and aren’t afraid of telling the
truth politically, trusting God that He will move and do His part, now that
we’ve done our part.
Martin: FBI Director Hoover, Earl
Warren, Gerald Ford, Johnson—Jesuit tools?
Phelps: Jesuit tools. All 33rd-Degree Freemasons. And remember, the Council of the 33rd Degree
is located in Washington. They control
all of the Shriners in this country.
Washington is controlled by the Jesuits from Georgetown.
The capital of the United States is at
Georgetown University, not the White House.
And if you
go into the president’s office at Georgetown, you will see a picture of Bill
Clinton, kneeling at the grave of Timothy Healy [past president of Georgetown], while the
present president, Donovan, who is on the Walt Disney Board, is standing behind
him.
I wanted
that picture; I wanted a copy of that picture.
Those people threw me out of that office. They would not let me have a copy of it. I sent another person, a lady, up there. They would not give it to her. I want that picture, for my book, of Bill
Clinton kneeling at the grave of these Jesuits.
Can’t get it. But if you go in
the president’s office, it’s there.
Georgetown
is the capital. They control all
Freemasonry. In fact, if you go to
Maryland, they’ve got the great big lodge across from a great big Jesuit
institution, in Baltimore—a great huge Shriner Lodge is across the street from a
Jesuit University. And they’re
enemies?
Martin: I want to talk about Bill Clinton in a
minute, but before we get to him, who is Cartha DeLoach?
Phelps:
Cartha DeLoach—his sir name was Deke. He was the 3rd-in-command of the FBI at the
time of the Kennedy assassination.
Cartha DeLoach was the real head of the FBI. Hoover was a wimp. His queer buddy, Tolson, who was nothing, was
second in command.
So Hoover
and Tolson were just figure-heads. The
real head of the FBI was Cartha DeLoach, the Knight of Malta, Roman Catholic,
subject to Cardinal Spellman.
Cartha
DeLoach fabricated evidence, covered-up evidence in the FBI, in the Kennedy
assassination. That was proven by Jim
Garrison. Cartha DeLoach went on to
retire. He went on to work for a huge
industry corporation called PepsiCo, which the Knights of Malta control, and
which have ranches in Communist China, which they set up. And he still lives.
Cartha
DeLoach wrote a book called Hoover’s
FBI. You can get it at the
bookstores. In that book he tells about
the Secret Service, the FBI, and the Jesuits.
Martin: Why do you refer to the Kennedy assassination
as the “Achilles’ Heel” of the Jesuits?
Phelps: Because, if it’s ever known that the
Jesuits killed our first Roman Catholic President, if the Roman Catholics of
Northeastern America ever find that out, and ever believe it, the Jesuits are
finished here.
This country is the keystone to
implementing the temporal power of the Pope around the world. If this country would expel the Jesuits, and
we get back our national sovereignty, and we started to be self-governing once
again, we would have our liberty, and the Jesuits would be out, and we would
begin to experience REAL financial prosperity, and real living.
So, if that
is known that the Jesuits are the ones behind it, that Rome carried this out,
the Catholics of the Northeast would have a revolution. We would have another revolution because
American Roman Catholics are not like Catholics in any other country: they
think. They have their own opinion. They believe in freedom of conscience. They believe they have the right to express
themselves.
Catholics in
Poland don’t believe that. Catholics in
Italy wouldn’t dare believe that. But
the Catholics here do. They have a lot
of Protestant principles. They don’t
really comprehend this whole idea of universal, world-wide temporal power of the
Pope. They think it’s just a
religion.
But, if
those Catholics in New York, if those two million Roman Catholics knew that
Spellman was behind it, and O’Connor has covered it up, we’d have a
revolution! Because it’s the Roman
Catholics, unfortunately, who only do anything about things. The Protestants don’t do anything. They’re all a bunch of wimps, a bunch of
cowards. They don’t do anything.
It’s the
Roman Catholics who apparently have built our major cities. They built our skyscrapers. They’re the great steel workers. They’re the ones, apparently, with the guts
enough to bring about a change. The only
problem is, they’re unGodly because they don’t know the Lord. They don’t read the Bible.
They don’t know Christ. They’re
not born-again. If they would get
born-again, and come to know Christ, with their determination and their
resistance to tyranny, we’d have another Reformation. And a lot of people’s heads would be going on
trial, and to the block, for treason.
Martin: I’m going to go back, now. How did the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion,
authored, according to you, by the Jesuits, further the Jesuit Agenda?
Phelps:
Ok. To anwer that, we
probably ought to look at the different Protocols. Now, to my mind, I believe there’s 20 or 30
Protocols; I can’t quite
remember. But the Protocols further the agenda of the
Jesuit Order in that Russia would be taken and, in the fall of Russia, in the
Bolshevik Revolution, two major things would happen: The Romanoff dynasty would
be removed. Now, of course, the Czar was
not killed at Ekaterinburg; we know that from the book The File On The Czar. We know that his daughter died in the state
of Virginia [not very long ago]. We know his son, Alexi,
became a member of the KGB, later came to New York, and he put out what
was called The White Paper. The Royal Family was not killed, because they
were Knights of Malta.
So, the
Knights of Malta took the Royal Family out, faked their death, and then after
they had taken the Romanoffs out, the Orthodox Church no longer had a protector,
because Church and State are one in Russia.
Now the
Jesuits were free, with their Bolsheviks, to kill-off the Orthodox leadership
that was anti-Rome. That’s why they
killed 5,000 priests and nuns, during the revolution, of the Orthodox
Church. They just beheaded all the
anti-Catholic, anti-Pope leadership of the Orthodox Church.
They got rid
of the Romanoffs, and then the next thing they did, they began to purge Russia
of its Protestants, in general. They
purged it of its Lutherans; they burned down the Lutheran Church; imprisoned the
Baptists; sent them off to Siberia. They
even destroyed two Jewish communities during the ’20s, which we’re not told.
The Jews
fared well for 10 years, until the purges of Stalin in the ’30s. But the Jesuits accomplished the killing-off,
the getting rid of the Romanoff dynasty and their protectorate of the Orthodox
Church, the beheading of the Orothodox Church, so they could bring Orthodox
Moscow back to Rome. And remember,
Moscow is considered the “Third Rome”.
The first is Rome; the second is Constantinople; the third is
Moscow. And you can find this, you can
find the Jesuit alliance with the Bolsheviks in a book called Descent Into Darkness by a priest named
Zatko, who taught at Notre Dame University in the ’60s.
And so the
Jesuits were given formal re-entry into Russia in 1922, after the Bolshevik
Revolution and Civil War, and from then on—the Russian College was erected in
Rome in 1929, so they could prepare Russian Jesuits to rule Russia. And that’s what they’ve done, and they’ve
ruled through the KGB, just like they rule this country through the CIA and the
FBI.
The Protocols outline this. Remember, the Protocols were discovered in Russia, and
translated by an Englishman, Marsden.
But what it also did—because then they set-up the huge gulag system, the
huge concentration camp system, that gave the Jesuits practice to do this in
Europe.
But their
great accomplishment was, in the process of pulling all of this off, they blamed
it on the Jews, and in so doing, justified in the eyes of the European people
the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe—because it’s the Jews who did this
in Russia! The Jews killed all the
Christians in Russia! The Jews sent them
off to Siberia! After all, wasn’t
Trotsky a Jew? Wasn’t Lenin a Jew? It’s all the Jews! So, they fell for the bait.
So they
blamed it all on the Jews, purged Europe of its Jews, so Europe is primarily
Roman Catholic now. It’s a Roman
Catholic block, and it will be the army of the Anti-Christ, with its European
Union.
The Jews,
then, were forced out of the nations to Israel.
And remember, during World War II, when the Jews tried to escape and they
were desperate to get out of Germany, do you think Jew-controlled Russia would
let the Jews in? If the Jews really
controlled Russia, they could have gone right into Russia. They were not allowed. Stalin would not allow any Jews to go into
Russia. Churchill would not allow any
Jews to go into England. And that
criminal, FDR, would not allow any Jews to come into America. They were not allowed to escape.
They were
either to be killed or funneled down through Israel, to be killed by the Mufti,
that was working with the SS, Eichmann.
Loftus is right. There is a secret war against the Jews, and
all of the intelligence communities are waging it.
And the Jews
don’t perceive it because their Rabbis, the majority of their Rabbis, are
traitors. I talked to a Rabbi in
Lancaster County and I told him to look out for the Jesuit Order. He says “Oh, they’re some of my best
friends!” Well, that explains it. The Rabbis betray their own people at the
hand of these inquisitors. And that’s
what they did in World War II, and they’re going to do it here.
Martin:
Let’s talk about Garfield and McKinley. Why were they assassinated?
Phelps:
I think Garfield was assassinated on a monetary issue; he was
resisting the banking plans of the Jesuits.
He was a radical, red Republican, too, you know, so they got rid of their
own. I’m not familiar with all of the
details. All I know is Burke McCarty in
the book The Suppressed Truth About The
Assassination Of Lincoln named McKinley and Garfield as other victims of the
Jesuit Order. And had the Lincoln
assassination been solved, that would never have happened. The other important issue is that Garfield
was a Freemason. So, they assassinate
their own Freemasons, when they want to.
Martin: Going back to Lincoln, who was John
Surratt?
Phelps:
John Surratt was the young man, 20 years old, who called time outside
of Ford’s Theater. He was mastermind of
the assassination. John Surratt was
helped by the priests of Washington to escape Washington, went up into Canada,
was taken care of and housed by the priests, by the Bishop of Montreal, and then
he was ferried across the ocean in The Peruvian, in a steamer called The Peruvian, and he went to, I believe,
Ireland, then into England, then he went to Rome, to the Pope’s Vatican
there. He joined the Zouave
army, and he was stationed in Alexandria,
Egypt, until he was found and arrested.
In 1867, he
was brought back and stood trial in Washington.
There a woman was involved in the picking of the jury, and a High Roman
Catholic was put on it. And because it’s
no murder to kill a heretic, the jury was hung in the first trial and Surratt
went free. And he was also free in the
second trial, because there were two trials. He died in 1914, I believe, at the age of 72,
and they gave him, of course, a very, very, pompous funeral, a High Requiem Mass
that are usually only given for priests and nuns. Evidently, he deserved it.
Of course,
John Wilkes Booth, he was never killed. Corbett never killed Booth in the barn. Booth escaped Washington with a password,
according to Finis Bates’ work The Escape
And Suicide Of John Wilkes Booth. He
escaped to Kansas, and on his death bed confessed to his physician that he was
John Wilkes Booth who shot Lincoln. And
he escaped with the help of a Masonic password.
So just like there was a patsy for the Lincoln assassination, there was a
patsy for the Kennedy assassination.
Martin: Why is April 15th so significant?
Phelps: (laughter) Well, April 15 was the day that Lincoln
called out troops on the South. It was
the day that Lincoln died. He was shot
on the 14th and died on the 15th. It’s
the day that the Titanic was sunk. And
it’s the day all the 14th Amendment citizens of this empire, like
the good serfs that they are, go to confession once a year and confess to the
government with their tax returns. Beware the Ides of April. (laughter)
Martin: Let’s talk about the Cold
War. Why did that come about?
Phelps: We had the end of World War II. We had the purging of the Jews and the
Protestants, for the most part. The
British Empire was destroyed, it’s wrecked, which was essentially the empire
that the Gospel went to China with.
Modern missions were founded on the British Empire.
So, that
Protestant Empire, even though it was controlled by Rome, was done. We have America in huge financial debt, out
of isolationism. We have a Russia that’s
taken over by the Jesuits, through Joseph Stalin. Of course, the great beneficiary of World War
II was Russia—Russia was the only country that won. But the Jesuits are not finished with their
purgings and their installings of dictators loyal to the Pope, around the
world. I mean, they pretty much have
South America. They pretty much have
Africa. But they don’t have the East,
and the Orthodox nations, and the Buddhist nations.
So, the
purpose of the Cold War was to kill millions of these heretic, orthodox
Buddhists, and to install in their country dictators that will carry out the
Inquisition, who are loyal to the Pope.
One of those
dictators was Joseph Stalin. And he was
given the nuclear device in 1943 by the U.S. government, by the U.S. army. And you can find that in The Unseen Hand by Ralph Epperson. He did a lot of good documentation.
So, they
gave him the bomb. I shouldn’t call it
“the bomb” because they gave him the nuclear device so that he could detonate it
and create the illusion that
Russia now has nuclear capability, when a wheel-barrow was a great invention in
Russia.
I mean, the
Russian soldiers, when they went into Germany and they found toilets, they were
dipping their bread in the toilets and eating their bread out of toilets. In Russia they were just savages. They didn’t have technology; they had
nothing. All the technology they ever
got was given by Vatican-controlled Western corporations, whose inventors were
Protestants.
So, the Cold
War has to continue under Stalin. And we
have to divide up the world into two factions, so we’re going to put Roman
Catholic NATO on one side, and we’re going to put Communist-controlled Warsaw
Pact on the other.
But in the
process of so doing, they put Protestant East Germany under Communism to purge
the Protestants of East Germany out of the country. That’s why they sent them to Siberia. They put Protestant-Lutheran Latvia,
Lithuania, and Estonia under Communism, so they deported them all to
Siberia. They put the Mennonites of
Russia further under Communism, deporting them to Siberia. They deported the Baptists of Russia to
Siberia, because they could only do—wimpy, gimpy, powerless, Russian army that
it was—we could easily have beat it into the ground, if it had not been financed
and supported and built by Henry Ford and Western corporations.
So, wimpy,
gimpy Russia has this nuclear device, right?
And oh, if we decide to go to war with Russia, well, we might get
bombed! There’s mutual, assured
destruction. So to keep that from
happening, we won’t fight ’em, and we’ll let them purge the world of all its
Protestants. That’s the purpose of the
Cold War.
The Cold War
then went into China, and the U.S. 7th Fleet, according to the Birch Society,
and they’re right about this, blocked Chiang Kai-Shek from being able to go into
China and take over the country. So, Mao
Se-Dung could get in control, get in power, and then carry out his inquisition
against the land owners, against the Buddhists, against all the Protestant
missionaries who were in China—just like the good Jesuit pawn that he was.
And, of
course, the intimidation idea was that you can’t go to China—why, there’s
millions of people there! Meanwhile, the
Japanese whipped the Chinese to death in their war with China, when the Japanese
went in. The Chinese had no
technology. They had no organized
army. They were easy to beat.
But the idea
we were sold was: Oh no—China is a great, powerful nation, and now they even
have the bomb! Stalin gave them a bomb,
so we can’t fight them anymore. So we
won’t do anything to them, while they’re murdering 50 million people. And remember the “baby-boomers” of the United
States, we would have fought the world.
We would have rid the world of tyranny, had we had leadership that would
have led us to that. But we had this
farce, called the nuclear, mutual assured destruction. We had this farce called the dropping of the
bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Whatever it was, it wasn’t dropping nuclear bombs—and Edwin Corley does a
pretty good job in his The Jesus
Factor, in trying to tell you what else it was.
And so, we
have this nonsense Cold War, which enables Rome to put up all their dictators,
their Communist dictators, all of them loyal to the Pope—including Ho Chi
Minh. Ho Chi Minh had a secret deal with
Pope John XXIII, and he was under the advice of a Roman Catholic Bishop all
throughout the war.
The purpose
of the Cold War was to carry out the Council of Trent, and to tie the hands of
the American Protestants; and it was also used to unite the Protestants and
Catholics of America against Communism.
Protestants and Catholics should unite on nothing. We are different. The Catholics have a final authority—that’s
the Pope. The Baptists and Protestants
should have a final authority—that’s the Bible.
We don’t unite on anything. We
don’t agree on anything. We don’t agree
on America’s national purpose, so we don’t unite. We’re not uniting with abortion; we’re not
uniting with Communism; we don’t unite against the Black or the Civil Rights
Movement.
You see, all
these things were used to unite Catholics and Protestants together here, so
that, ultimately, Rome would be in control of all the Protestant denominations
through the National Council of Churches and the Royal Council of Churches. And that’s what they got. They took Princeton; they took Dartmouth
College. All the great Protestant
Universities are now in the hands of the Masons and the Jesuits. Harvard has a Jesuit House. They’re controlled. And so, wherever they control education, they
control the politics. And they control
the education in China, Russia, all the Communist countries. Now that they have all of the dictators
installed all throughout the world, they don’t need the Cold War anymore. So now they can proceed with their next
agenda, and that’s the unification of Europe, the building up of Russia, and the
destruction of the Western Empire. And
that’s their next agenda.
Martin: How do you see that unfolding?
Phelps: What’s that?
Martin: The destruction of the Western
Empire.
Phelps: As far as the actions of
overthrowing the government and having a tyranny, is that what you mean?
Martin:
Right. What do you see life
like here in the next 5 or 10 years?
Phelps: It’s hard to put a date on it; it’s hard to
put a year on it. But I would say it’s
going to continually become more and more a matter of “central power” in
Washington. You’re going to have less
and less power in the Congress. And one
of these days, the Congress is going to be closed. And all we’re going to have is a
Commander-in-Chief. We’re going to have
some form of absolutism, with the President becoming now a dictator.
Martin: Do you think George Bush, Jr. will be that
person?
Phelps: He could be.
I won’t say he will be, but he could be.
It will be someone like him—with complete allegiance to Rome, just like
his father. His grandfather helped set
up the CFR. His uncle is a Knight of
Malta. It will be someone like him.
And he WILL
be the next President. They’ve already
chosen him in the College of Cardinals.
Everything else is a show.
Jesuit-trained Buchanan is a show.
Roman Catholic McCain is a show.
The Black Roman Catholic Keyes is a show, although he tickles me. He advocates abolition of the 14th Amendment. If that happens, what are the Black people
going to do? They’re not citizens; they
have no rights! Dred Scott comes into
play. He’s a fake.
So, what I
see is more and more centralization of power in the hands of the President. The Supreme Court is just a rubber
stamp. He becomes the king. The courts are nothing more than the courts
of the king’s bench. The Federal Reserve
Bank will remain in power. Everything
will be monitored and controlled by Washington, unless some of God’s men start
trusting God and get in control of the state and cause it to secede. The only answer to this is state secession,
leaving this Union—it’s not a Union, it’s an Empire—leaving the Empire
that began in 1868, assuming national sovereignty, once again. And the first state that would do this, I’m
moving there. Because I don’t want to
see the FBI anymore. I don’t want to see
the CIA. I don’t want to see any of
these national bureaucracies anymore.
Martin: Montana seems close. Arizona seems close.
Phelps: Well, when they do it, I’ll move there. But that’s what would happen if things
continue as they are. We’ll have race
war. We’re going to have the Moslems
fighting the Klu Klux Klan. Whites
siding with the Whites; the Blacks siding with the Blacks. It’s going to be a blood-bath
everywhere. And that will justify
Martial Law, and the military, and the whole nine yards, and also foreign
occupation; we’re going to have that too.
And you know how foreigners are in a foreign country. They rape the women. They couldn’t care less about the social
strata of the country. They have no
mercy on the people. They have a foreign
tongue. And that’s what they’ll do. And that’s all the more reason for a state to
secede.
I’ve
advocated that Pennsylvania should secede for the last 15 years. We have our own deep-water ports; we have our
own agriculture; we have our own heavy industry; we have coal; we have
everything we need to be a sovereign nation.
We don’t need this Empire anymore.
The only problem is, Pennsylvania is COMPLETELY controlled by the
Jesuits.
Every major
city is under their control. And so, the
place is slated for destruction—all the Mennonite and Amish counties of
Southeastern Pennsylvania. Everything
else is Catholic: Pittsburgh, Scranton, Philadelphia, Harrisburg—all Roman
Catholic. The Roman Catholic people,
too, will also be sacrificed. They will
be killed too. Let them not think that
they’re going to be delivered because the Jesuits run the show. According to the Jesuit Molina, in the tape I just sent you, it
is lawful to kill—and they will kill as many Roman Catholics as necessary to
bring this plan to fruition.
Martin: Define the Jesuit term: Universal
Absolutism.
Phelps: Define it?
That means worldwide, universal, over every nation, absolute power. Absolutism is their great doctrine, that
absolute power resides in the hands of the General. He is limited by no constitution. He is limited by no law.
This is the Great Doctrine of Divine Right,
the Divine Right of Kings that was so fought against by the Calvinists. We Bible-believing Calvinists believe in
the Rule of Law. The Law is king. Rutherford’s “Lex Rex”. The Jesuits believe the king is the law—Louis
XIV: “I am the law”. So, it’s going to
be a universal, world-wide king who, himself, is the law. All authority will be in him, as he rules the
world from Jerusalem, as the Beast.
Martin: Are we talking about the present Pope, or are
we talking about Count von Kolvenbach?
Phelps: I’m saying that what’s in position now will
ultimately bring in the future Pope, whoever he is, and whatever it may be, as a
Universal Absolutist—the Universal Monarch of the World, in Jerusalem.
Martin: Symbolic?
Or you’re saying literal?
Phelps: I’m saying that will literally happen. There will be a Pope, who will be killed; he
will receive a mortal wound. And this is
going to happen in the 70th week of Daniel.
He will receive a mortal wound, according to Revelation 13.
This is the
Beast, and he will come back to life. He
comes back to life, mid-trip, at the very time that Satan and his angels are
cast out of Heaven by Michael and his angels.
At this time, Satan goes and he indwells the Beast, this Pope. Now he comes back to life, just like
Christ. He was dead; now he’s
resurrected.
And what is
he going to do? He’s going to destroy
the Catholic Church. He’s going to
destroy the Vatican; and he’s going to go down in Jerusalem and demand to be
worshipped as God, for three and a half years.
That’s why
the Vatican is indestructible. No one
can destroy the Vatican. All the armies
in the world couldn’t destroy it. It has
been determined that it will be destroyed by the Anti-Christ. And he, alone, can do it.
That’s why,
when the Yugoslavians wanted to mount an air attack against the Vatican in World
War II, a bunch of clouds came over the airport and they couldn’t take off,
because they were going to bomb the Vatican.
The world will not allow that to happen.
The Vatican will only be destroyed by the man of sin, the Beast, the
coming Universal Monarch, the ex-Universal Pope.
The Vatican
has the most extensive library in the world, the most priceless and extensive
library. It goes for miles, underground,
in the Vatican.
Martin: Wouldn’t you love to go in there.
Phelps: I would love to. Talk about finding sunken treasure.
Martin: We’ve almost covered it. I almost don’t want to dilute this
conversation with the FDA and AMA. Let’s
talk about them just briefly.
Phelps: Ok.
World War II, produced of course by Rome, caused the Nazi experiments on
the people in the concentration camps—the Jews, the Gypsies, the Socialists,
primarily the Jews. But they
experimented with things like fluoride.
They experimented with things like EDTA chelation, which is THE treatment
of choice for anybody with heart disease.
They experimented with poisons.
They experimented with surgeries.
They experimented with all kinds of things on these people. They also experimented with vaccinations and
immunizations.
There’s a
book called The Nazi Doctors. Everything that was learned by them was
integrated into the American Medical Association, after the war. That’s why we all have our municipal water
supplies fluoridated. That’s why they’re
all chlorinated, because chlorine decreases oxygen, and therefore causes cancer,
because cancer grows in an anaerobic state—it’s a virus, converting cells into
mutants that are anaerobic.
Ok. All of Europe is using ozone to clean their
water supplies. Here they use
chlorine. They want us with cancer. And how do we get cancer? With the vaccinations and immunizations,
where they inject us with live viruses, like the hepatitis vaccine—every one of
them has the HIV virus, SV-40.
What they’re
doing is what they learned in Nazi Germany.
They implemented here and they continue their research in the CIA. There’s a two-tape set called The CIA And The Virus Makers which show
how the CIA helped to create the HIV virus and various other viruses. They get into Robert Gallo, the world’s
foremost virologist.
Robert Gallo
is a Jesuit. He’s a Roman Catholic,
Italian, the world’s foremost virologist—and yet not controlled by the
Brotherhood, by the Company?
Ridiculous. He’s under their
control! He’s doing all the research,
and he doesn’t want to be blamed for it—as the WONDERFUL Jew, Len Horowitz,
proved. Again, we’ve got Jews getting in
the way—Jews blowing their cover.
Martin: I’ve interviewed Len many times. He’s a very courageous guy.
Phelps: Great guy.
And he’s right on target. And he
hits the Knights of Malta in his book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. He was a great encouragement to me when I saw
him do that, when I read his book.
So, hey,
let’s just take it the whole way. Let’s just go right to the Jesuit Order. And what the Jesuits did with the Cold War,
with their Inquisition in the East, they carry out with their war on the
American people in the West, with their Medical Inquisition—cut, burn, and
drug. And that’s what it is.
Personally,
I have my own home where I use ozone oxygen.
I use ultraviolet blood irradiation.
I can show you how ultraviolet blood irradiation incapacitates
Lupus. It destroys Hepatitis. It destroys Meningitis. It destroys HIV.
This is a
very simple procedure; I do it every day.
It can easily be done by any medical doctor, and they won’t do it. Because, when you kill off the virus, you
don’t have the diseases. You are
thwarting what they wanted to do with their vaccinations and immunizations.
That’s why
they want to make a law. That’s why that
filthy Ted Kennedy, that Knight of Columbus, wants all these vaccinations and
immunizations—when it should be a religious tenet of everyone: “It’s against my
religious convictions to put foreign pathogens into my bloodstream. It’s going
to make me sick by the time I’m 40. It’s
going to give me plaque build-up and heart-disease. I’m not going to do it.”
In the
meantime, they’re suppressing all the things that reverse it: soft lasers,
hyperbaric chambers, ultraviolet blood irradiation, oxygen ozone, north-pole
magnetic therapy. All the things working
together that would easily reverse it, they suppress, and consider it a
crime. Make sense?
Martin: Rife technology.
Phelps: When I was in the office of my friend,
William, in Maryland, he told me that he had a guy from NSA [National Security Agency] come in and
talk to him about his blood irradiation, and told him: “I think that it would be
wise for you to stop this.”
Now, this
guy who runs the clinic there in Maryland is an ex-Navy Seal. He’s no pushover. So he says to the NSA guy: “Well, why do you
say that?”
And the NSA
guy said: “You know how Royal Rife died?
We put poison on his tooth-brush.”
This guy was
from NSA. So, that was a threat. Well, now, some people get scared, and some
people get upset, angry. William is one
of those guy who gets upset and angry, and it furthers him that much harder.
So,
mysteriously, the head of the Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation Foundation died,
about 3 or 4 months ago, in his apartment, with no autopsy. So they almost destroyed the foundation, but
now he is in the process of securing capital—and he will, I’m sure, very
shortly, and it’s going to be untouchable.
The machines will be put out and it will have UVC and UVA to do the
blood, and we’re going to kill-off all the viruses in the bloodstream. And we’re going to teach the medical doctors
how to do it. We’ll provide the machines
for them. And we’re going to end this
tyranny. And we’ll also educate them—no
more vaccinations and immunizations.
There are
only two things I’m a member of in this country: one is the national
anti-vaccine society, and the other is Gun Owner’s of America. Those are the only two organizations that are
really worth supporting. If you get the
vaccinations away from the people, they’re not going to be sick. And if you maintain guns in the hands of the
people, they can still use them against the tyrants. And if they go to church and read the Bible, they’ll have all the spiritual
zest and zeal to do it.
Martin: We haven’t even talked about Nikola Tesla in
this conversation.
Phelps: Yeah.
He was deliberately thwarted by the FBI, all his papers stolen in
1943. J.P. Morgan destroyed him. J.P. Morgan was one of the kingpins in the
Titanic sinking.
Nikola Tesla
was a wonderful man. He came here for
freedom. He was a Serbian Orthodox—a
curse to Rome. The father of A.C.
current. He developed a whole system of
Universal Power, that we would need no coal or any of that. So, one of my other goals is to perfect the
electromagnetic motor. When my book gets
out, then I will be working with some men in perfecting electromagnetic motors,
and they will be out, without a patent, privately.
Martin: We’re just about there. Let’s talk about Bill Clinton. How do you see Bill Clinton in relationship
to the Jesuits? And how do you see Al
Gore? What can our readers glean from
what you’re saying about their power base?
Phelps: Well, we must remember: where did Bill
Clinton come from? How did he become
Governor? His father was a powerful
political figure, because his mother was nothing. So, he came from nothing to being something,
through some powerful political figure, probably the Kennedys.
It’s rumored
that John Kennedy was his father; could be.
In any event, Clinton was trained by the Jesuits of Georgetown. He was the class president of his junior
year, I believe. His senior year, he was
not re-elected because the student body said he was “too close to the Jesuit
faculty”.
So, he was
groomed by the Jesuits to be a powerful political leader. He was put in place in Arkansas, runs that
scam there, while he’s Governor, in the drug trade, belonging to Rome, working
with Reagan in the drug trade, and Bush.
Then he’s made President.
Remember the
picture of him at Georgetown, kneeling at the grave of Timothy Healy? That says it all. He is the complete and total pawn of the
Jesuit Order ruling from Georgetown University.
He does anything they want him to do.
He hasn’t resisted a thing.
That’s why
he’s untouchable. He can commit any
crime. He can do any act of evil, and
never be prosecuted, because they’ll call on traitors like Arlen Spector to
vindicate him. And, of course, Arlen
Spector was Spelly’s Jew in the Kennedy assassination—evil, wicked, lifetime
Senator from Pennsylvania, which shows me that there are no elections anymore.
Nobody voted for Arlen Spector who I
know. He’s a gun-grabber. So, they made him a life-time Senator. They made Teddy Kennedy a lifetime
Senator.
Bill Clinton
is completely at their beck and call. He
will get out of office. He will live
happily ever after, unless he starts talking.
If he starts talking, he’s done.
He is NOT a Baptist. He is loyal
to the Jesuit Order.
Martin:
Ok, let’s talk about God and His Agenda.
Phelps:
As I understand the Bible,
I believe we are in what’s called the Dispensation of Grace. I’m a dispensationalist. Now, there are those who say that
dispensationalism was a brain-child of the Jesuits. Could be, could be Jesuits were involved with
that. But I believe the Bible teaches this, because God deals
with men in different ways, at different times.
He commands
Abraham to sacrifice a lamb, but not me.
We don’t do that now. He commands Noah to build an ark. We don’t do that now. He commands Moses to receive the Law of
Sinai. We’re not under the Law; it’s for
the Nation of Israel. He commanded his
son to announce that the Davidic
kingdom was ready to be established on Earth—repent, for the Kingdom is at
hand. The Kingdom, promised to David, is
about to be established, and that’s why they called him Son of David.
And now we
live in the Dispensation of Grace, called the present Evil Age, of Galations, Chapter 1:4, and the
Dispensation of Grace of Ephesians,
Chapter 3. During this particular
period of time, this stewardship, the Gospel says that the Lord Jesus Christ
died for the sins of our world; he was buried and rose again.
And God
commands all men, everywhere, to repent and believe on His name that they might
be saved. But there is no other name
under Heaven whereby we must be saved, save the name of Jesus. During this time, this good news of
forgiveness of sin and free pardon, and we can be with the Lord for eternity, is
going to every nation, Jews and Gentile.
And during this Dispensation of Grace, Jews and Gentiles are regarded as
one, in the body of Christ, when they’re saved.
Now,
according to Romans, Chapter 11,
there is what is called the “fullness of the Gentiles”. There is a fullness that is a predetermined
amount of people who are going to be saved.
We call them “the elect”. We call
ourselves the elect of the Lord.
Now when
that elect, that predetermined number, is saved, then God will begin to deal
with the nations and Israel, once again.
And that will begin, according to Daniel, Chapter 9, when the Prince shall
come, shall confirm a covenant with many for one week. That is the 70th week of Daniel.
The first 69 weeks have been fulfilled, from the decree, to rebuilding
Jerusalem, to Messiah the Prince, the day Christ declared himself the Messiah of
Israel, was 69 weeks of years. After
that the Messiah would be cut-off, and Jerusalem would be destroyed. That is the gap between the 69th and the 70th
week. The temple is not destroyed; the
city is not destroyed; the Messiah is not cut-off, during the 69th or the 70th
week. There’s a gap between those two
weeks, and that gap has gone to nearly 2,000 years. In the year 2032, it will be 2,000
years. Because Christ was crucified in
32 A.D.
Ok, during
this dispensation, God is saving Jews and Gentiles out of all nations and
placing them in the body of Christ, by the power of His Holy Spirit, as the
Gospels preached. When the predetermined
number comes to fruition, then the Lord will take out his Bible-believing church, and everybody
else is left to go through what is called “the time of Jacob’s trouble”, in the
Book of Jeremiah, or the Great Day of
the Lord—the 7-year tribulation, talked about in the Book of Revelation, Chapter 4-19.
That 7-year
tribulation will be when the Lord begins to judge this world for its rejection
of the Messiah, and for their sins, having not been taken care of, not having
been saved; although there will be many people saved during this time. (NOTICE! This ministry
does NOT agree with the Vatican inspired 7 year tribulation. See
facts exposing it here.)
The Jews
will be tremendously persecuted. The
vast majority of them will be murdered, and there will be a remnant who will
repent at the end of the Tribulation, at which time the Messiah will come and
they will look upon him, whom they pierced, and weep because they will realize
that the one who is going to save them from all these Gentile armies pouring
into Israel, is the very one they crucified.
When the
Lord Jesus destroys all the Gentile armies, he will then set up the Davidic
Kingdom that he came to set up—the born-again nation of Israel.
Can a nation
be born in a day? Isaiah, Chapter 66—they will be
born-again, they will inherit all the promises, and Christ will sit down in the
Kingdom with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, just like he talked about, and he
will eat the fruit of vine again.
Because he said: “I will not eat this henceforth, til ye say, ‘Blessed is
he that come in the name of the Lord’ until I eat it anew with you in the
Kingdom.” Then he will drink wine; he
will eat the fruit of the vine; he will break bread; and he will be Messiah,
King of the World at that time, ruling the world from Jerusalem.
So, what we
have coming is more unbelief, more persecution, less faith, less manhood, less
guts, and we have more persecution from the Jesuit Order, more monetary
control. We have another scenario of the
World Government, under the Pope from Jerusalem, and that’s what the Jesuits
want. And, ultimately, God in His
providence, has allowed for 42 months for that to happen: 1260 days.
So that’s
what I see coming. But what I believe
is, I don’t believe that the doctrine of the coming Anti-Christ should be used
as fatalism—that we should: “Well, that’s coming, so we can’t do anything about
it. The bastards are coming to take us
out.”
That’s an
excuse to cowardice. We need to do our
duty. We need to resist evil in
ourselves and around us, and as long as we have breath. And part of resisting that evil is resisting
the Jesuit Order. It’s resisting
anti-Christian tyranny. It’s resisting
absolutism. It’s resisting criminals who
are in your government.
We have a
civil responsibility, and that’s to make sure government punishes evil and
rewards good. And when it doesn’t punish
evil anymore, it’s no government. We
don’t know allegiance to it anymore. We
withdraw our allegiance, and we assume our own sovereign power.
And that’s
exactly what the Covenanters did with Scotland when they withdrew their
allegiance from, what was it, King James II, or Charles II; they withdrew their
allegiance and the English settled there and, ultimately, many of those
Covenanters were killed. But in the glorious Revolution of 1688, they
got their liberty.
Another
thing is, all these men—they want to win right now. They want to do something and experience the
win. We have no guarantee of that. Why not just say the way it is, resist the
tyranny, and if we get killed in the process, then praise God—I mean, isn’t
Heaven a little better than this place?
What’s the big fear? All these
men do not know the Lord, as far as trusting Him in the midst of a storm. They’re full of fear; they’re full of terror;
and they’re all afraid to die.
So,
hopefully, with the true preaching of the Gospel—and ultimately there will be
some preachers who will arise who will encourage us to do right and not fear
death, and to resist these powers of evil—hopefully that will begin to change
and there will be men who will call for secession, and states will begin to
leave this Union, like Chechnya, and these others, and then the Lord will
intervene for us.
If we honor
Him, He’ll honor us. If we fight for His
causes, He’ll bless us. And we need to
stop looking at the odds. We’ve always
been outnumbered. We’ve always been
outgunned. And that’s the way God likes
it, because then, when we win, obviously He did it.
So that’s
what I see for the future, and I see there’s a great vacuum right now that needs
to be filled. And it can be filled with
the men of God telling the truth, or it can be filled with Jesuits advocating
everybody give-up, lay down their guns, and submit to this New World Order,
under the Pope.
The question
is: What are YOU, dear reader, going to
do?
Editor’s note: Eric Jon Phelps’ book Vatican Assassins will likely be available through Wisdom
Books & Press (see Back Page) after August 1. We will provide specific information about
cost, etc., in an upcoming issue of The SPECTRUM when it is closer to the date of
availability.
Please note that Rick Martin’s new email
address is rm888@mindspring.com for
any comments you may wish to direct his way.
The following are direct excerpts from the
forthcoming book by Eric Jon Phelps called Vatican Assassins.
The
Jesuits – 1540
Their Purpose And Oath
The purpose
of the Jesuit Order, formally established by the Pope in 1540, is to destroy the
Protestant Reformation. They call it the
Counter-Reformation. Nicolini of Rome
wrote:
“The
Jesuits, by their very calling, by the very essence of their institution, are
bound to seek, by every means, right or wrong, the destruction of
Protestantism. This is the condition of
their existence, the duty they must fulfill, or cease to be Jesuits.” [Footprints of the Jesuits, R. W.
Thompson, 1894]
Extract from Jesuit’s Oath
To this end
the professed Jesuits have obligated themselves with an oath, part of which was
published in 1899, and reads:
“I do now
renounce and disown my allegiance as due to any heretical King, Prince or State,
named Protestant, or liberals, or obedience to any of their laws or magistrates
or officers.
“I do
further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of
the Calvinists, Huguenots, and other of the name Protestant or Liberals, to be
damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same.
“I do
further declare that I will help, assist and advise all or any of His Holiness’
agents, in any place where I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland,
Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other kingdom or
territory I shall come to, and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical
Protestant or liberal doctrines, and to destroy all their pretended powers,
legal or otherwise.” [Errors of the Roman Catholic Church, 15
Contributors, 1894]
In 1981, one
of our heroes, Alberto Rivera, disclosed the oath he took as a professed
Jesuit. We read:
Ceremony Of Induction And
Extreme Oath Of The Jesuits
(Given to a Jesuit of minor rank when he is
to be elevated to a position of command.)
Superior
Speaks:
My son,
heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler among the Roman Catholics
to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren: to believe
no man, to trust no man. Among the
reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots (French Protestants) to be a
Huguenot: among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist: among the Protestants (those
who protest and disagree with the Roman Catholic institution), generally to be a
Protestant: and obtaining their confidence to seek even to preach from their
pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence (violent emotion) in your nature
our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew
among the Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for
the benefit of your order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.
“You have
been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealously and hatred between
states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in
war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in communities,
provinces and countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the
arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace;
“To take
sides with the combatants and to act secretly in concert with your brother
Jesuit who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with
which you might be connected;
“Only that
the church might be the gainer in the end in the conditions fixed in the
treaties for peace, and that the ends justify the means.
“You have
been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information
in your power from every source: to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of
the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as
well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and
universities, in parliament and legislatures, and in the judiciaries and
councils of State, and to ‘be all things to all men’, for the Pope’s sake, whose
servants we are unto death.
“You have
received all your instructions heretofore as a novice (one who has no training),
a neophyte (a newly ordained priest), and have served as a coadjutor (worked as
a helper), confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all
that is necessary to command in the army of Loyola and in the service of the
Pope.
“You must
serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your
superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated (made secret or
holy) his labors with the blood of the heretic; for ‘without the shedding of
blood no man can be saved.’
“I, _____,
now, in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed
Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St.
Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven....
“I,
furthermore, promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make
and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants
and Liberals, as I am directed to do.
“That when
the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the
strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard (a dagger) or the leaden bullet,
regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons,
whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any
time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or superior of the
brotherhood of the holy faith, of the Society of Jesus.” [Double-Cross: Alberto, Part 2, 1981]
* *
*
In addition
to the Oath, the Jesuits have a guidebook entitled Secreta Monita. To the author’s knowledge it has only been
disclosed to the world twice: once in the 1600s and once in the 1800s. Because of the magnitude of its contents as
it relates to our subject, The Secret
Instructions Of The Jesuits (1857) is reprinted in its entirety [in Vatican Assassins].
[Due to the
length of this material, we here at The
SPECTRUM will only present a few excerpts and chapter headings, but this
should be sufficient to give you a pretty good idea of what is contained within
them. For the full presentation, refer
to Vatican Assassins. The portions your are about to read have not,
to our knowledge, been printed in any modern-day newspaper.
What you are
about to read, The Secret Instructions Of
The Jesuits, was first published in 1669 by the venerable and learned Dr.
Compton, Bishop of London. In Vatican Assassins we read:]
His
arguments on their authenticity, and his character as a scholar and divine, are
a sufficient guarantee that he would never have given his name and influence to
sustain a work of dubious authority, or calculated to mislead the public.
We have only
to add that the last American edition, published at Princeton, and this one
which we publish, are taken from the translation which was published in London
in 1723, and dedicated to Sir Robert Walpole, who was afterwards Lord Orford,
and who had the high honor of being prime minister of George I and George
II.
THE
SECRET INSTRUCTIONS
OF
THE JESUITS
Chapter 1:
How the Society must behave themselves when they begin any new
foundation.
V. At their first settlement, let our members be
cautious of purchasing lands; but if they happen to buy such as are well
situated, let this be done in the name of some faithful and trusty friend. And that our poverty may be the more
colorable gloss of reality, let the purchases, adjacent to the places wherein
our colleges are founded, be assigned by the provincial to colleges at a
distance; by which means it will be impossible that princes and magistrates can
ever attain to a certain knowledge what the revenues of the Society amount
to.
VI. Let no places be pitched upon by any of our
members for founding a college but opulent cities; the end of the Society being
the imitation of our blessed Saviour, who made his principal residence in the
metropolis of Judea, and only transiently visited the less remarkable
places.
VII. Let the
greatest sums be always extorted from widows, by frequent remonstrations of our
extreme necessities.
VIII. In every province, let none but the principal
be fully apprised of the real value of our revenues; and let what is contained
in the treasury of Rome be always kept as an inviolable secret.
Chapter II: In what manner the Society must deport, that
they may work themselves into, and after that preserve a familiarity with
princes, noblemen, and persons of greatest distinction.
I. Princes, and persons of distinction every
where, must by all means be so managed that we may have their ear, and that will
easily secure their hearts; by which way of proceeding, all persons will become
our creatures, and no one will dare to give the Society the least disquiet or
opposition.
II. That ecclesiastical persons gain a great
footing in the favor of princes and noblemen, by winking at their vices, and
putting a favorable construction on whatever they do amiss, experience
convinces; and this we may observe in their contracting of marriages with their
near relations and kindred, or the like.
It must be our business to encourage such, whose inclination lies this
way, by leading them up in hopes, that through our assistance they may easily
obtain a dispensation from the Pope; and no doubt he will readily grant it, if
proper reason be urged, paralleled cases produced, and opinions quoted which
countenance such actions, when the common good of mankind, and the greater
advancement of God’s glory, which are the only end and design of the society,
are pretended to be the sole motives to them.
V. Above all, due care must be taken to curry
favor with the minions and domestics of princes and noblemen; whom by small
presents, and many offices of piety, we may so far byass, (bias) as by means of
them to get a faithful intelligence of the bent of their master’s humors and
inclinations; thus will the Society be better qualified to chime in with their
tempers.
VII. Princesses and ladies of quality are easily
to be gained by the influence of the woman of their bed-chamber; for which
reason we must by all means pay particular address to these, for thereby there
will be no secrets in the family but what we shall have fully disclosed to
us.
XV. Finally,—Let all with such artfulness gain
the ascendant over princes, noblemen, and magistrates of every place, that they
may be ready at our beck, even to sacrifice their nearest relations and most
intimate friends, when we say it is for our interest and advantage.
Chapter III: How the Society must behave themselves
towards those who are at the helm of affairs, and others who, although they be
not rich, are nothwithstanding in a capacity of being otherwise
serviceable.
I. All that has been before mentioned, may, in a
great measure, be applied to these; and we must also be industrious to procure
their favor against every one that oppose us.
II. Their authority and wisdom must be courted
for obtaining several offices to be discharged by us; we must also make a handle
of their advice with respect to the contempt of riches; though at the same time,
if their secrecy and faith may be depended on, we may privately make use of
their names in amassing temporal goods for the benefit of the Society.
Chapter IV: The chief things to be recommended to
preachers and confessors of noblemen.
VI. Immediately upon the death of any person of
post, let them take timely care to get some friend of our Society preferred in
his room; but this must be cloaked with such cunning and management as to avoid
giving the least suspicion of our intending to usurp the prince’s authority; for
this reason (as has been already said) we ourselves must not appear in it, but
make a handle of the artifice of some faithful friends for effecting our
designs, whose power may screen them from the envy which might otherwise fall
heavier upon the Society.
Chapter V:
What kind of conduct must be observed towards such religious persons as
are employed in the same ecclesiastical functions with us.
Chapter VI: Of proper methods for inducing rich widows to
be liberal to our Society.
I. For the managing of this affair, let such
members only be chosen as are advanced in age, of a lively complexion and
agreeable conversation; let these frequently visit such widows, and the minute
they begin to show any affection towards our order, then is the time to lay
before them the good works and merits of the society. If they seem kindly to give ear to this, and
begin to visit our churches, we must by all means take care to provide them
confessors by whom they may be well admonished, especially to a constant
perseverance in their state of widowhood, and this, by enumerating and praising
the advantages and felicity of a single life: and let them pawn their faiths,
and themselves too, as a security that a firm continuance in such a pious
resolution will infallibly purchase an eternal merit, and prove a most effectual
means of escaping the otherwise certain pains of purgatory.
IV. Care
must be taken to remove such servants particularly as do not keep a good
understanding with the Society; but let this be done by little and little; and
when we have managed to work them out, let such be recommended as already are,
or willingly would become our creatures; thus shall we dive into every secret,
and have a finger in every affair transacted in the family.
Chapter VII: How such widows are to be secured, and in
what manner their effects are to be disposed of.
I. They are perpetually to be pressed to a
perseverance in their devotion and good works, in such manner, that no week pass
in which they do not, of their own accord, lay somewhat apart out of their
abundance for the honor of Christ, the blessed Virgin, or their patron saint;
and let them dispose of it in relief of the poor, or in beautifying of churches,
till they are entirely stripped of their superfluous stores and unnecessary
riches.
XIII. Let the confessors take diligent care to
prevent such widows as are their penitents, from visiting ecclesiastics of other
orders, or entering into familiarity with them, under any pretence whatsoever;
for which end, let them, at proper opportunities, cry up the Society as
infinitely superior to all other orders; of the greatest service in the church
of God, and of greater authority with the Pope, and all princes; and that it is
the most perfect in itself, in that it discards all persons offensive or
unqualified, from its community, and therefore is purified from that scum and
dregs with which these monks are infected, who, generally speaking, are a set of
men unlearned, stupid, and slothful, negligent of their duty, and slaves to
their bellies.
XIV. Let the confessors propose to them, and
endeavor to persuade them to pay small pensions and contributions towards the
yearly support of colleges and professed houses, but especially of the professed
house at Rome; not let them forget the ornaments of churches, tapers, wine, and
things necessary in the celebration of the sacrifice of mass.
XV. If any widow does in her life-time make over
her whole estate to the Society; whenever opportunity offers, but especially
when she is seized with sickness, or in danger of life, let some take care to
represent to her the poverty of the greatest number of our colleges, whereof
many just erected have hardly as yet any foundation; engage her, by a winning
behavior and inducing arguments, to such a liberality as (you must persuade her)
will lay a certain foundation for her eternal happiness.
XVI. The same art must be used with princes and
other benefactors; for they must be wrought up to a belief, that these are the
only acts which will perpetuate their memories in this world, and secure them
eternal glory in the next.
Chapter VIII: How widows are to be treated, that they may
embrace religion, or a devoted life.
Chapter IX: Of increasing the revenues of our
Colleges.
XV. Let the confessors be constant in visiting
the sick, but especially such as are thought to be in danger; and that the
ecclesiastics and members of other orders may be discarded with a good pretence,
let the superiors take care that when the confessor is obliged to withdraw,
others may immediately succeed, and keep up the sick person in his good
resolutions. At this time it may be
advisable to move him by apprehensions of hell, and at least of purgatory; and
tell him, that as fire is quenched by water, so sin is extinguished by acts of
charity; and that alms can never be better bestowed than for the nourishment and
support of such who by their calling profess a desire to promote the salvation
of their neighbor.
XVI. Lastly, let the women who complain of the
vices of ill-humor of their husbands, be instructed secretly to withdraw a sum
of money, that by making an offering thereof to God, they may expiate the crimes
of their sinful help-mates, and secure a pardon for them.
Chapter X.
Of the private rigor of discipline in the Society.
Chapter XI. How our members are unanimously to behave
towards those who are expelled from the Society.
I. Since those that are dismissed, do frequently
very much prejudice the Society by divulging such secrets as they have been
privy to; their attempts must therefore be obviated in the following
manner. Let them be prevailed upon,
before they are dismissed, to give it under their hands, and swear that they
never will, directly or indirectly, either write or speak any thing to the
disadvantage of the Order; and let the superiors keep upon record the evil
inclinations, failings and vices, which they, according to the custom of the
Society, for discharge of their consciences, formerly confessed: this, if ever
they give us occasion, may be produced by the Society, to the nobility and
prelates, as a very good handle to prevent their promotion.
VIII. Let the misfortunes, and unlucky accidents
which happen to them, be immediately published; but with entreaties for the
prayers of good Christians, that the world may not think we are hurried away by
passion: but, among our members, let these things, by all means, be represented
in the blackest colors, that the rest may be the better secured.
Chapter XII. Who should be kept, and favored in the
Society.
Chapter XIII. How to pick out young men to be admitted into
the Society, and in what manner to retain them.
V. Let them be allured, by little presents, and
indulgence of liberties agreeable to their age; and, above all, let their
affections be warmed with spiritual discourses.
VI. Let it be inculcated, that their being chosen
out of such a number, rather than any of their fellow-collegiates, is a most
pregnant instance of divine appointment.
VII. On other occasions, but especially in
exhortations, let them be terrified with denunciations of eternal punishment,
unless they accept of the heavenly invitation.
VIII. The more earnestly they desire admission into
our Society, the longer let the grant of such favor be deferred, provided at the
same time they seem steadfast in their resolution; but if their minds appear to
be wavering, let all proper methods be used for the immediate firing of
them.
Chapter XIV. Of reserved cases, and causes of dismission
from the Society.
Chapter XV. Of our conduct towards nuns and female
devotees.
[It is noted
in the pre-publication copy of Vatican
Assassins from which these excerpts are being extracted that one of the
pages is missing from this section of the instructions.]
Chapter XVII. Of the methods of advancing the
Society.
I. Let our members chiefly endeavor at this,
always to act with humanity, even in things of trifling moment; or at least to
have the outward appearance of doing so; for by this means, whatever confusions
may arise in the world, the Society of necessity will always increase and
maintain its ground.
VII. The favor of the nobility and superior
clergy, once got, our next aim must be to draw all cures and canonships into our
possession, for the more complete reformation of the clergy, who wheretofore
lived under certain regulation of their bishops, and made considerable advances
towards perfection. And lastly, let us
aspire to abbacies and bishoprics, the obtaining which, when vacancies happen,
will very easily be effected, considering the supineness and stupidity of the
monks; for it would entirely tend to the benefit of the church, that all
bishoprics, and even the apostolical see, should be hooked into our hands,
especially should his holiness ever become a temporal prince over all. Wherefore, let no methods be untried, with
cunning and privacy, by degrees, to increase the worldly interests of the
Society, and then, no doubt, a golden age will go hand in hand with an universal
and lasting peace, and the divine blessing of consequence attend the catholic
church.
VIII. But if our hopes in this should be blasted,
and since offences of necessity will come, our political schemes must be
cunningly varied, according to the different posture of the times; and princes,
our intimates, whom we can influence to follow our councils, must be pushed on
to embroil themselves in vigorous wars one with another, to the end, our Society
(as promoters of the universal good of the world,) may on all hands be solicited
to contribute its assistance, and always employed in being mediators of public
dissensions; by this means the chief benefices and preferments in the church
will, of course be given to us by way of compensation for our services.
IX. Finally, the Society must endeavor to effect
this at least, that having got the favor and authority of princes, those who do
not love them at least fear them.
* * *
JESUIT
POWER
The Society
of Jesus was thenceforth recognized as the chief opposing force of
Protestantism. The Order became dominant
in determining the plans and policy of the Rowish Church. The brotherhood grew and flourished. It planted its chapters first in France,
Italy and Spain, and then in all civilized lands. The success of the Order was phenomenal. It became a power in the world. It sent out its representatives to every
quarter of the globe. Its solitary
apostles were seen shadowing the thrones of Europe. They sought, by every means known to human
ingenuity, to establish and confirm the tottering fabric of Rome, and to
undermine the rising fabric of Protestantism.
They penetrated to the Indus and the Ganges. They traversed the deserts of Thibet, and
said, “Here am I,” in the streets of Peking.
They looked down into the silver mines of Peru, and knelt in prayer on
the shores of Lake Superior. To know all
secrets, fathom all design, penetrate all intrigues, prevail in all counsels,
rise above all diplomacy, and master the human race, — such was their purpose
and ambition. They wound about human
society in every part of the habitable earth, the noiseless creepers of their
ever-growing plot to retake the world for the Church, and to subdue and conquer
and extinguish the last remnant of opposition to her dominion from shore to
shore, from the rivers to the ends of the earth.” [Ridpath’s Universal History, John Clarke
Ridpath, 1899]
* * *
The Jesuits
are the true authors of socialist-communism.
The economic system of the Dark Ages was feudalism consisting of the few
rich landowners and the many poor peasants.
It was a sin to make a profit by anyone other than the feudal lords. Thus, if the world is to be returned to the
Dark Ages, the Protestant middle class must be destroyed. Socialist-communism accomplishes this, having
yielded its bitter fruit in both Great Britain and the United States. The great deception is that the Jews are the
authors of communism. (After all, is not
Zionism Jewish communism?) The facts are
that the Jesuits used their Masonic Jews to introduce it in 1848 and again in
1917 with the Bolshevik Revolution.
The Jesuits
then moved their Shriner Freemason FDR to recognize Russia’s bloody government
in 1933. The Jesuits then financed
Russian communism with their Knights of Malta on Wall Street. This enabled Joseph Stalin to carry out the
purges of the Thirties.
Having
deceived the world into believing communism was of Jewish origin, the Jesuits
then used Hitler to implement “the Final Solution to the Jewish
Question”—pursuant to the evil Council of Trent. The result was the mass murder of European
and Russian Jewry at the hands of the Jesuit-controlled SS.
At the close
of the Second Thirty Years War (1945) the Jesuits, with their Vatican Ratline,
helped top Nazis to escape to South America.
And where in South America? To
the old dominion where socialist-communism had been perfected by the Jesuit
fathers—to the nation of Paraguay.
The Jesuits
entered Paraguay in the early 1600s, sent by the kings of Spain and
Portugal. They established their
supremacy over the natives called “Guarani Indians” and did not allow them to
mix with the Spanish or Portuguese. It
was among this people that the Jesuits established their communes called
“reductions”.
* * *
THE
JESUITS — 1776
The Jesuits,
now formally suppressed by the Pope, were allied with Frederick the Great of
Prussia and Catherine of Russia. The
Jesuit General was in control of Scottish Rite Freemasonry and now sought an
alliance with the Masonic House of Rothschild in England. To accomplish this he chose a Jesuit who was
Jewish by race—Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt
was a brilliant instructor of Canon Law—the evil Council of Trent—at a Jesuit
university in Bavaria. We read:
“From the
Jesuit College of Ingolstadt is said to have issued the sect known as ‘the
Illuminati of Bavaria’ founded by Adam Weishaupt. Its nominal founder, however, seems to have
played a subordinate though conspicuous role in the organization of this sect.”
[Occult Theocracy, Lady Queenborough,
originally published in 1933]
On May 1,
1776, the Order of the Illuminati was officially founded in the old Jesuit
stronghold of Bavaria. The Company would
now use the Jewish House of Rothschild to finance the French Revolution and the
rise of Napoleon the Freemason with his Jesuit-trained advisor, Abbe
Sieyes. In spite of the historical
writings of the Jesuit Abbe Barruel, who blamed the Rothschilds and Freemasonry
for the Revolution, it was the Society of Jesus that used these very tools to
carry out the Revolution and punish the monarchs who dared to expel the Jesuits
from their dominions. The Jesuits,
having been expelled from the Spanish Empire, found refuge in Corsica. From there they raised up their great
avenger, Napoleon Bonaparte.
* * *
Lately, it
was George Washington who was so beloved by France’s General Lafayette. During the Revolution our great chieftain
took the “boy General” under his wing for which cause the Frenchman named his
eldest son, George Washington Lafayette.
With this same endearing love the Roman Catholic Lafayette warned:
“It is my
opinion that if the liberties of this country, the United States of America, are
destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for
they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies of civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of
Europe.”
* * *
Napoleon was captured by the English and
banished to the island of St. Helena.
There, his Memoirs were
written which accurately described his masters, the Jesuits:
“The Jesuits are a military organization,
not a religious order. There chief is a
general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is:
POWER. Power in its most despotic
exercise. Absolute power, universal
power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms:
and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses....
“The general of the Jesuits insists on
being master, sovereign, over the sovereign.
Wherever the Jesuits are admitted they will be masters, cost what it
may. Their society is by nature
dictatorial, and therefore it is the irreconcilable enemy of all constituted
authority. Every act, every crime,
however atrocious, is a meritorious work, if committed for the interest of the
Society of the Jesuits, or by the order of the general.” [Fifty
Years In The Church Of Rome, Charles Chiniquy, 1968, reprinted from the 1886
edition, quoting Memorial Of The
Captivity Of Napolean At St. Helena, General Montholon]
* * *
The Knights
of Malta and the Jesuits work together!
(Truth
seeker, this may seem irrelevant now, but it is important for you to be aware of
this connection. As we shall see, the
Knights financed Lenin and Hitler from Wall Street, also using their Federal
Reserve Bank headed by Masonic Jews, Warburg in particular.) The Knights negotiated the Concordat (a Papal
treaty) between the Pope and Hitler in the person of Franz Von Papen. They also helped top Nazis to escape to North
and South America after World War II in the persons of James Angleton and
Argentina’s President Juan Peron.
In America,
the Knights, with their OSS, later the CIA, were behind “Operation
Paperclip”. After World War II, top
Nazis and scientists were illegally secreted into the United States. Many were placed in the top-secret military
installation in Tonapah, Nevada known as “Area 51”. The perfection of the Nazis’ anti-gravity
aircraft (flying saucers) was to be completed there, among other secret
technologies. “Operation Paperclip” was
overseen by America’s most powerful Knight of Malta, J. Peter Grace. J. Peter Grace was subject to the
Jesuit-trained Archbishop Spellman, as the American headquarters for the Knights
was and is St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York.
* * *
1816 – JOHN ADAMS
Our founding Fathers
knew of the Jesuit intrigue directed at the new Protestant Republic of these
United States of America. In 1816, John
Adams wrote to President Jefferson:
“Shall we
not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the
gypsies can assume, dressed as painters, publishers, writers, and
schoolmasters? If ever there was a body
of men who merited eternal damnation on Earth and in Hell it is this Society of
Loyola’s.” [The New Jesuits, George Riemer,
1971]
* * *
PRESIDENT
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
A personal
friend of Professor Morse believed his warning of this Jesuit conspiracy. He was President Abraham Lincoln. We read:
“The
Protestants of both the North and South would surely unite to exterminate the
priests and the Jesuits, if they could learn how the priests, the nuns, and the
monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their
religion...are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon III, and
the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts
of our people from our Constitution,
and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they
have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who
want to be free.” [Fifty Years In The Church Of Rome,
Charles Chiniquy, 1968, reprinted from the 1886 edition]
* * *
The
Jesuits — 1868-1872
This new
nation would be a centralized republic with the President exercising powers of
an absolute monarch. The old Federal
Republic of Washington would be converted into a huge centralized Empire, with
the ten planks of the Masonic Communist
Manifesto replacing the Ten
Commandments of Moses.
In order to
accomplish this, the Constitution had
to be amended—“by hook or by crook”. It
would be amended in accordance with the Masonic cry of both French
Revolutions. “Liberty” would be the Thirteenth Amendment. “Equality” would be the Fourteenth Amendment. “Fraternity” would be the Fifteenth Amendment. We now will examine the Fourteenth Amendment,
as it was the coup d’etat.
* * *
THE
ASSASSINATION
OF
PRESIDENT LINCOLN
Even thought
he acted the tyrant in keeping Maryland from seceding and raised the Army of the
Potomac to “put down the rebellion”, there is evidence that he had a change of
heart. Accordingly to many, Lincoln was
converted to Christ after viewing the battlefield at Gettysburg. He later joined the Presbyterian Church in
Washington and had several spiritual conversations with his close friend and
converted priest, Charles Chiniquy. We
read:
“I will
repeat to you what I said at Urbana, when for the first time you told me your
fears lest I would be assassinated by the Jesuits: Man must not care where and when he will die,
provided he dies at the post of honor and duty.
But I may add, today, that I have a presentiment that God will call me to
Him through the hand of an assassin. Let
His will, and not mine, be done! The
Pope and the Jesuits, with their infernal Inquisition, are the only organized
powers in the world which have recourse to the dagger of the assassin to murder
those whom they cannot convince with their arguments or conquer with the
sword.... It seems to me that the Lord
wants today, as He wanted in the days of Moses, another victim.... I cannot conceal from you that my impression
is that I am that victim. So many plots
have already been made against my life, that it is a real miracle that they have
failed, when we consider that the great majority of them were in the hands of
skillful Roman Catholic murderers, evidently trained by Jesuits. But can we expect that God will make a
perpetual miracle to save my life? I
believe not. The Jesuits are so expert
in those deeds of blood, that Henry IV said that it was impossible to escape
them, and he became their victim, though he did all that could be done to
protect himself. My escape from their
hands, since the letter of the Pope to Jeff Davis has sharpened a million
daggers to pierce my breast, would be more than a miracle.” [Fifty
Years In The Church Of Rome, Charles Chiniquy, 1958, originally published in
1886]
[Further
along:]
Of the
Jesuit hand in Lincoln’s murder we read:
“I feel safe
in stating that nowhere else can be found in one book the connected presentation
of the story leading up to the death of Abraham Lincoln, which was instigated by
the “black” pope, the General of the Jesuit Order, camouflaged by the “white”
pope, Pius IX, aided, abetted and financed by other “Divine Righters” of Europe,
and finally consummated by the Roman Hierarchy and their paid agents in this
country and French Canada on “Good Friday” night, April 14, 1865, at Ford’s
Theatre, Washington, D.C.” [The Suppressed Truth About The Assassination
Of Abraham Lincoln, Burke McCarty, 1973, originally published in 1924]
* * *
THE
JESUITS — 1945-1990
The Great
and Terrible Second Thirty Years’ War was now over. Europe, Russia, North Africa, China, and
Japan were “a universal wreck” thanks to the Company of Jesus. Millions of “heretics” had been “extirpated”
pursuant to the Jesuit Oath and the
Council of Trent. Unlike the Treaty of
Westphalia ending the First Thirty Years’ War, the agents of the Jesuits
controlled the negotiations at Yalta and Potsdam ending the second Thirty Years’
War.
It was time
to apply the Jesuits’ Hegelian Dialectic worldwide. It would be known as “the Cold War”. The thesis and antithesis would be “the Free
World in the West” verses “the Communist Block in the East”. The American Empire would head the West, and
the Russian Empire would lead the East.
Both sides would be financed by the Jesuits’ International Banking Cartel
centered in London and New York—the Federal Reserve and Chase-Manhattan Banks in
particular.
The
synthesis would be the destruction of the American Empire through the so-called
“ending of the Cold War”. The illusion
of ending the Cold War would legally enable Rome’s Corporate Monopolies,
federated together in New York City under the leadership of the Council on
Foreign Relations, to give Russia and China high technology and financial
backing. The giving of these necessities
would perfect the War Machines of both economically communist and politically
fascist giants for the purpose of invading North America, it containing
the majority of the world’s Protestants, Baptists, and Jews. It is for these reasons that the financial
might of Hong Kong was given to Red China, along with an American Naval Base in
Long Beach, California. It is for these
reasons that the Panama Canal, built with American blood, sweat, tears and
Yellow Fever, was given away to Panama to be manned by Chinese soldiers
imperiling the American navy. It is for
these reasons that the Jesuits in control of Washington have established
nationwide gun registration for the purpose of nationwide gun
confiscation just as they did in Hitler’s Germany. It is for these reasons that the Jesuits,
with their international corporations managed by the Knights of Malta, have
financed and continue to build both the Russian and Chinese War Machines, while
influencing American Presidents to close down scores of military installations
across the country. These facts spell
invasion—massive invasion by millions of foreign soldiers, with no
God and no mercy. And if the Jesuits can
manage to blow-up the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem and blame the American
Empire for it, the Arabs will declare a holy war against “the great Satan”. The private wealth of Americans using
International Business Corporations with bank accounts in the Bahamas will be
seized just as they were in Castro’s Cuba.
(The Knights have moved all their wealth into European banks denominated
in Franks and Marks as well as Eurodollars, thereby escaping the coming American
economic catastrophe.)
Meanwhile,
as the Jesuits, with their American dictator’s internal police (FEMA) and
foreign invaders, are “extirpating” “the execrable race” of American “heretics”
and “liberals”, the European nations will be driven to lay down their historic
differences and unify.
This
unification will restore the Holy Roman Empire, for which reason the Jesuits are
rapidly rebuilding Rome. When the smoke
clears, China will control the East, Russia will control the North, and a
unified R.C. [Roman Catholic] Europe
will control the West. The Pope’s
International Intelligence Community will see to it that Jerusalem is declared
an international city with Solomon’s rebuilt Temple in her midst. World government will ensue and the Jesuits’
“blessed despotism” of the Dark Ages will have arrived, with the Pope being the
Universal Despot of the World, so appropriately described in the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion, while
being the World Authority of The
Documents Of Vatican II.
* * *
The
Jesuits — 1963
THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT
KENNEDY
“It is of
faith that the Pope has the right of deposing heretical and rebel
kings. Monarchs so deposed by the
Pope are converted into notorious tyrants, and may be killed by the first
who can reach them.
“If the
public cause cannot meet with its defense in the death of a tyrant, it is lawful
for the first who arrives, to assassinate him.” [Defensio Didei, Jesuit Suarez, Book VI.
C 4, Nos. 13, 14]
Freed
remembers what apparently passes for polite conversation when men such as Colby
and Cline get together. “It was quite
bizzare” Freed said, “for the subject they chose was, ‘When is it acceptable to
assassinate a head of state?’ Colby
presented what he said was a theological and philosophically sound
approach. The Catholic Church, he said,
had long since wrestled with this question and had, to Colby’s mind, emerged
with a sound concept: “It is
acceptable” he said, “to assassinate a tyrant.” [Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, 1991, p.
85]
“A
conspiracy is rarely, if ever, proved by positive testimony. When a crime of high magnitude is about to be
perpetrated by a combination of individuals, they do not act openly, but
covertly and secretly. The purpose
formed is known only to those who enter into it. Unless one of the original conspirators
betray his companions and give evidence against them, their guilt can be proved
only by circumstantial evidence...and circumstances can not lie.” [Special Judge Advocate John A. Bingham,
quoted in The Trial Of The Conspirators,
Washington, 1865]
This chapter
will examine the forest, not the trees.
The hundreds of works covering the assassination can be reduced to a few
simple facts. These facts viewed in the
context of the previous chapters lead us to the “Lion” in his “Den of Iniquity”
that had the power to execute Kennedy’s murder and successfully cover it
up. That Lion was the Cardinal of New
York and his Den of Iniquity was St. Patricks’ Cathedral, “the Little Vatican”,
and home base of the American Branch of the Knights of Malta. From the death of Cardinal Spellman in 1967
until now (1999), the succeeding “Lions” having kept the assassination
covered-up were: Cardinal Cooke (himself
a Knight of Malta) and Cardinal O’Connor, a former Navy Chaplain during
Spellman’s Vietnam War, and presently the Archbishop of New York.
Knowing that
President Kennedy was not going to escalate the Vietnam War, the Intelligence
Community began to prepare for his assassination. Roman Catholic Lee Oswald was chosen to be a
patsy.... As a CIA agent, he had been
sent to Soviet Russia by Allen Dulles in 1959, supposedly as a defector. Knowing that the CIA (OSS) and the KGB (NKVD)
had worked together during WW-II, Oswald apparently took a vacation for nearly
two years. During that time he married a
Russian whose uncle was a Colonel in the KGB.
When he
returned to the American Empire in 1962, he associated with CIA agents Howard
Hunt, Frank Sturgis, David Ferrie, Guy Banister, Count George DeMohrenschildt,
and Clay Shaw. Oswald was CIA, and
related to a Jesuit. Emannuel Josephson
tells us:
“An
interesting angle is presented by the Lee Oswald involvement. His cousin is reported to be a Jesuit
priest. And it is a matter of record
that Lee Oswald was invited to address the Jesuit college in Springhill,
Alabama, on the subject of his activities, two weeks before the Kennedy
Assassination. The Jesuit involvement
closely parallels that in the Lincoln Assassination.” [The
Federal Reserve Conspiracy And Rockefellers, Emanuel M. Josephson, 1968]
Jim Garrison
clearly proved the CIA was involved in the assassination through Clay Shaw. He writes:
“...we
discovered Shaw’s extensive international role as an employee of the CIA. Shaw’s secret life as an Agency man in Rome,
trying to bring Fascism back to Italy, was exposed in articles in the Italian
press.... To me among the most
significant revelations were...the confirmation by both Victor Marchetti and
Richard Helms that Clay Shaw had been an agent of the Central Intelligence
Agency.” [On The Trail Of The Assassins, Jim
Garrison, 1991]
And who was
the Director of the CIA in 1963? It was
Knight of Malta John McCone. Prior to
that McCone had been a defense contractor who had formally headed the Atomic
Energy Commission. Later in 1970, he was
a board member of ITT while remaining a CIA consultant. Marchetti tells us:
“[The] ITT
board member who later admitted to a Senate investigative committee that he had
played the key role in bringing together CIA and ITT officials was John McCone,
director of the CIA during the Kennedy administration and, in 1970, a CIA
consultant.” [The CIA And The Cult Of Intelligence,
Victor Marchetti, 1975]
Cardinal
Spellman’s soldier, John McCone, Director of the CIA, participated in the
Kennedy assassination.
Jim Garrison
and others have proved that the FBI was also involved in the assassination. He writes:
“I already
had concluded that parts of the local Dallas law enforcement establishment were
probably implicated in the assassination or its cover-up. But now I saw that the highly respected FBI
was implicated as well.” [On The Trail Of The Assassins, Jim
Garrison, 1991]
Cardinal
Spellman had two agents in the FBI. The
first was the Shriner Freemason and brother-Cold Warrior, J. Edgar Hoover. According to Loftus, Hoover had cooperated
with the Vatican Ratlines resettling Nazi war criminals in the Northeast. Why would he not cooperate with Spellman
now? How could he refuse?
More
importantly, Spellman’s key man in the FBI was Knight of Malta, Cartha
DeLoach. As the third in command,
DeLoach was in a position to supervise the assassination and suppress
evidence. Garrison proved DeLoach did in
fact suppress evidence.
After the
assassination we see a telling relationship between Johnson and DeLoach. DeLoach was known as Johnson’s man in the FBI
and the President would call him any time of the day. Curt Gentry writes:
“Lyndon
Johnson couldn’t sleep. Late at night he
had his aide, Marvin Watson, telehone the DeLoach bedroom. The president had suddenly become convinced
that the murder of his predecessor had been a conspiracy and wanted more
information from the FBI.” [J. Edgar Hoover: The Man And The
Secrets, Curt Gentry, 1991]
This is the
Cartha DeLoach who had signed a five-year contract with Lee Iacocca’s Ford
Mercury in connection with the series, “The FBI”. Both DeLoach and Iacocca were Knights of
Malta, subject to Cardinal Spellman during the Kennedy assassination. Later DeLoach went on to be a director of
PepsiCo. And according to Col. Prouty,
that company also participated in Kennedy’s assassination. We read:
“Nixon was
in Dallas with a top executive of the Pepsi-Cola Company, Mr. Harvey Russel, the
general counsel. Nixon was a legal
counsel to that corporation. That top
executive’s son has told of Nixon’s presence in Dallas at the time of the
assassination, and Russell has confirmed the accuracy of his son’s account. Later, sometime after the shooting, Nixon was
driven to the Dallas airport by a Mr. DeLuca, also an official of the Pepsi-Cola
Company. In addition, the son of another
Pepsi-Cola executive was in Dallas at that time and had dinner with Jack Ruby,
Oswald’s killer, the night before JFK was murdered.” [JFK:
The CIA, Vietnam, And The Plot To Assassinate John F. Kennedy, Col. L.
Fletcher Prouty, 1992]
DeLoach,
Iacocca, and the Knights of Pepsi, now PepsiCo, all worked together.
At the time
of the assassination in Dallas, the Catholic priest, Oscar Shubert, was sent
from Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Dallas to administer “Last Rites” for the
President. Knowing that Kennedy’s wounds
were wounds of entry, he reported everything to his superior. Shubert’s superior was the Bishop of Dallas,
then The Most Reverend Thomas Kiely Gorman, DD.
According to Martin Lee’s article entitled “Who Are The Knights Of
Malta?” appearing in the October 14, 1983 edition of the National Catholic Reporter, Thomas K.
Gorman was a Knight of Malta. Being a
brother Knight he reported directly to Cardinal Spellman, and kept him appraised
of what was happening in Dallas.
At the time
of the assassination in Dallas, roughly 12:30 P.M. in the afternoon, all the
telephones went dead in Washington, D.C. for about 30 minutes. How could this have happened? Someone at ITT had to be responsible, as it
served the Washington area. In 1963, one
of the VIPs of ITT was Francis D. Flanagan.
You guessed it. Flanagan was a
Knight. Later, McCone, with his brother
knights, coordinated a deal between the CIA and ITT to better work together.
The author
knows there were several Knights of Columbus involved in the Kennedy
assassination. They were working for the
FBI in particular. But the only notable
Knight who was involved was Senator Edward Kennedy in that, through his silence,
he was consenting to his brother’s murder.
Maybe this is what has driven the perpetual Senator from Massachusetts to
his ruined alcoholic life. Let us take a
few moments to pray for the Senator that he might have a change of heart, that
he would tell all, and that we might protect him. For he too was subject to the power of
Cardinal Spellman.
Lastly we
know that the Mafia was involved in the Kennedy assassination. The Mafia, CIA, FBI, and Office of Naval
Intelligence has been working together throughout World War II. Jack Ruby was a mafioso and David E. Scheim
makes it perfectly clear in his Contract
On America that the Mob had at least two motives: the Kennedy brothers
assault on Organized Crime and the loss of the Mob’s gambling paradise in
Cuba.
But those
were not the reasons. The Mafia Dons
were promised that they would make more money than Havana could ever produce,
through the explosion of the international drug trade made possible by the
Vietnam War. If they helped eliminate
Kennedy, Johnson would escalate the war and, thereby, the drug trade. The CIA would bring the drugs in from the
Golden Triangle, distribute them to the Mafia families, and both would
profit.
More
importantly, the Mafia’s Commission had a favor to repay. Cardinal Spellman, through FDR, had arranged
the release of “Lucky” Luciano because of “Operation Underworld” mentioned in
the previous chapter. Now the Cardinal
needed a favor. If refused, Spellman
could use the entire intelligence community which he had helped to organize, to
eliminate any mob boss. If agreed to,
new gambling centers would open up, Atlantic City in particular.
Clearly, if
the President was removed, everybody would acquire more power and wealth, the
intelligence community would become more absolute, and the Cardinal would be
even more respected by his peers in Rome.
The rest is history.
Later, in
1964, for the first time in history, the Pope of Rome set foot in Fourteenth Amendment America. Cardinal Spellman had performed well and was
rewarded by a visit from his Master, fellow Cold Warrior and Vatican Ratline
handler, Cardinal Montini, who was now Pope Paul VI.
There is yet
another reason for the removal of President Kennedy. He wanted to arm Israel. Loftus writes:
“In
September 1962 Kennedy decided to supply Israel with defensive ground-to-air
missiles capable of stopping aircraft, but not the Egyptian offensive
missiles. It was the first arms sale by
the U.S. Government to Israel....
Kennedy promised the Israelis that as soon as the 1964 election was over,
he would break the CIA ‘into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the
winds’.... With Kennedy’s assassination
in November 1963, the Israelis lost the best friend they had in the White House
since Truman departed.” [The Secret War Against The Jews, John
Loftus, 1994]
And why did
the Vatican’s Jesuits not want any arms sales to Israel at this time? Why did the Jesuit-controlled President
Johnson turn his back as the Egyptian army moved up through the Sinai desert to
prepare its assault on Israel in 1967?
Because the attack upon Israel had to be provoked. That attack was provoked by the Jesuits’
International Intelligence Community through Egypt falsely perceiving the
weakness of the Israeli army and the supposed abandonment of Israel by the
American Empire.
The six-day
war, engineered by Knight of Malta James Angleton, had one primary purpose: the
taking of Jesusalem along with the Temple Mount. The apparent lack of military hardware on the
part of Israel provoked the planned attack by Egypt. Therefore, Israel launched a preemptive
strike and, in six days, the holy city was in the hands of Rome’s Zionist
government.
Had Kennedy
armed Israel, the Egyptians would never have been emboldened to maneuver for
war. With no provoked war, there would
have been no Israeli attack. With no
Israeli attack, Jerusalem would never have been taken by the Zionists,
controlled by the Jesuits’ Mossad. With
Jerusalem in Arab hands, the Zionists could never rebuild Solomon’s
Temple—unbeknown to them—for the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope “Who opposeth
and exalted himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so he is
God sitteth in the temple of God [Solomon’s rebuilt temple], showing himself
that he is God.” [II Thes 2:4]
It is safe
to say that the Jesuit General, using the Pope with his most powerful Cardinal
in the American Empire, assassinated President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
For it was
Cardinal Spellman, “the American Pope” in command of his soldiers, the Knights
of Malta, who oversaw the assassination.
And it was
the Knights of Malta, using the Central Intelligence Agency, who aided in the
actual assassination of the President.
Those Knights were: CIA Director, John McCone, CIA officers William F.
Buckley, and Henry Luce.
In 1963,
both William F. Buckley and Henry Luce were personal friends of CIA agent Howard
Hunt. We read from Mark Lane’s Plausible Denial on page 270, concerning
Time and Life magazines, of which Henry Luce was
the owner:
“I (Howard
Hunt) had them typed up on a typewriter (fabricated official cables), and they
were xeroxed, and the xeroxes were eventually shown to a person of Mr. (Charles)
Colson’s confidence, and in Time and
Life.” Hunt, after swearing that he had never been
involved in a disinformation effort to embarrass Kennedy, had now testified that
he had merely sought to doctor and create evidence to prove that Kennedy was a
murderer.
Again in Plausible Denial we read of Hunt’s
connection with pompous William F. Buckley, Jr. on page 207:
“(G. Gordon)
Liddy completed his testimony perfectly, stating that while he no longer
associated with Hunt, he did see him last, he recalled, when both men
demonstrated their support for another former CIA officer, William F. Buckley,
as Buckley celebrated the anniversary of his television show at the New York
Yacht Club.”
Dear truth
seeker, Hunt was close to both powerhouses, Buckley and Luce. Hunt was also working with two of his fellow
criminals in the future Watergate scandal, G. Gordon Liddy (Jesuit-trained) and
Chuck Colson.
And in 1985,
it was Mark Lane who proved in Miami’s federal court that Hunt was in Dallas the
day President Kennedy was murdered.
Therefore, the conclusion was obvious.
The CIA, with its agent, E. Howard Hunt, had killed the President. In the words of the jury’s forewoman, Leslie
Armstrong, found on the inside cover and page 322 of Plausible Denial, we read:
“Mr. Lane was asking us to do something very
difficult. He was asking us to believe
that John Kennedy had been killed by our own government. When we examined the evidence (for 65
minutes) we were compelled to conclude that the CIA had indeed killed President
Kennedy.” Hunt had been part of it, and
that evidence, so painstakingly presented, should now be examined by the
relevant institutions of the United States Government, so that those responsible
for the assassination might be brought to justice.
|